期刊文献+

异常值检验方法的比较分析 被引量:10

Comparative Analysis of Outlier Test Methods
下载PDF
导出
摘要 针对格鲁布斯检验法、t检验法检测异常值的局限性,使用格鲁布斯检验法、t检验法、跳跃度检验法对异常值的个数分七种情况进行模拟研究,并对工效学用户测评数据的异常值检验结果进行比较分析,研究结果表明,跳跃度检验法识别异常值的准确率更高,并且在一定数量的异常值下避免了Masking效应(判异为正)和Swamping效应(判正为异)。当数据差异较小时,格鲁布斯检验法和t检验法检测异常值的效果较好,当数据差异较大时,跳跃度检验法检测异常值的效果更好。 Aiming at the l imitations of Grubbs’ test method and T-test method, These are studied that a simulation study on the number of outl iers in seven cases, by using the Grubbs, test method, T-test meth-od and jump test method, and a comparative analysis of outlier results about the data of ergonomics evalua-tion by user test. It can be proved that Jump test method, the accuracy is more accurate in identifying out-lier, and the method can avoid the Masking effect (outl iers are judged to be normal values) and Swamping effect (normal values are judged to be outliers) in a certain amount of outl iers. Grubbs’ test method and T-test method have a better effect on detecting outliers, when the difference of data is small, and the jump test method has a better effect on detecting outl iers are also confirmed, when the difference of data is large.
出处 《青岛大学学报(自然科学版)》 CAS 2017年第2期106-109,共4页 Journal of Qingdao University(Natural Science Edition)
基金 国家科技部国家科技支撑项目(批准号:2014BAK01B04-2)资助
关键词 格鲁布斯检验法 Z检验法 跳跃度检验法 Grubbs' test method T-test method jump test method
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献29

共引文献60

同被引文献65

引证文献10

二级引证文献27

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部