两种不同方法治疗肩周炎疗效对比

Comparison of Curative Effect of Two Different Methods in Treatment of Scapulohumeral Periarthritis

目的探讨针灸治疗与针灸推拿联合治疗肩周炎的临床效果。方法该院自2012年6月—2015年6月收治的肩周炎的患者共167例。随机分为研究组84例和对照组83例,研究组行针灸推拿联合治疗,对照组行针灸治疗。通过对比两组治疗前后肩部疼痛评分及肩关节功能改善情况评估治疗疗效。结果研究组和对照组治疗前肩关节功能UCLA评分和肩部疼痛VSA评分分别为(19.3±0.8)分、(19.2±0.9)分,(6.8±0.7)分、(6.8±0.6)分,两者比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。治疗后功能UCLA评分和肩部疼痛VSA评分在治疗后1周、1个月及6个月对比,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论针灸推拿联合治疗肩周炎疗效优于单纯针灸治疗,值得临床推广。

Objective To study the clinical effect of acupuncture therapy and acupuncture and massage therapy for scapulohumeral periarthritis. Methods 167 cases of patients with scapulohumeral periarthritis admitted and treated in our department from June 2012 to June 2015 were selected and randomly divided into two groups, the research group with 84 cases adopted the acupuncture treatment, while the control group with 83 cases adopted the acupuncture and massage therapy,and the shoulder pains score and shoulder joint function improvement situation before and after treatment were compared between the two groups, and the curative effect was evaluated. Results The differences in the shoulder joint function UCLA score and shoulder pains VAS score between the research group and the control group were not statistically significant[(19.3±0.8)points,(19.2±0.9)points vs(6.8±0.7)points,(6.8±0.6)points](P>0.05),after treatment, and the differences in the function UCLA score and shoulder pains VAS score in 1 week, 1 month and 6 months after treatment were statistically significant(P <0.05). Conclusion The curative effect of acupuncture and massage therapy is better than that of simple acupuncture treatment, which is worth clinical promotion.