期刊文献+

基于规则空间模型的3-4年级阅读障碍儿童语素意识的认知诊断 被引量:2

Diagnostic Dyslexia Test of Morphological Awareness for 3~4 Grades Based on the Rule Space Model
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:以认知诊断理论的规则空间模型为基础,对3~4年级阅读障碍儿童的语素意识进行认知诊断。方法:从2138份有效样本中筛查出3~4年级202名阅读障碍儿童,73人完成A题本,129人完成B题本。结果:经过验证性因素分析,各项拟合指标均达到模型可接受的标准,表明两个题本各项目及分测验的属性层级关系适当;项目难度参数大多介于[-3,+3]之间,区分度参数大多在0.30以下,处于可接受范围;语素意识的判归有三种典型属性掌握模式,A、B题本中学生掌握一种属性的人数较多,掌握概率均在60%以上;两个题本中掌握同音同形字的学生均达到100%,掌握语素理解的学生比例分别为34.21%和21.21%,学生对语素组合的掌握概率分别为2.63%和8.33%。结论:阅读障碍儿童对同音同形字的辨别度较好,对语素理解和语素组合的掌握能力较差。 Objective:based on the rule space model (RSM),development of diagnostic dyslexia test of morphological awareness for 3 !4 grades. Methods: 2138 effective samples are adopted,which includs 73 RD (reading disabilities)samples of the diagnostic dyslexia test A and 129 RD samples of diagnostic dyslexia test B. Results : the hierarchical relationship of attributes was proved to be a good indicator of the degree of fitting; most of the difficulty parameters of the project are between[-3,+3] , and the distinction between the parameters are mostly below 0.30'there are three kinds of typical attribute mastery patterns in the judgment of the morpheme consciousness, and the number of the children in the mode 1 is more than that of A and B, which is more than 60X ; the mastery of the homonymous is the probability of 100X , the mastery of the morpheme understanding is 34.21% and 21.21% respectively, the mastery of the morpheme combination is 2.63X and 8.33X respectively. Conclusion : the morpheme understanding and combination of the children with RD are not good.
出处 《教育测量与评价》 2017年第5期12-16,39,共6页 Educational Measurement and Evaluation
基金 湖南省教育厅科学研究项目(13A057) 湖南省哲学社会科学基金项目(14YBA284)研究成果
关键词 语素意识 阅读障碍 规则空间模型 morphological awareness, dyslexia, rule space model
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献10

  • 1[1]Brady and Shankweiler,(Eds.),Phonological processes in literacy,Hillsdale,1991:NJ:Erlbaum
  • 2[2]Bowers P,Newby C E.The role of naming speed within a model of reding acquistion.Reading and writing:an interdisciplinary journal 2002,15:109~126
  • 3[3]Calisle and Nomanbhoy.Phonological and morphological awareness in first graders.Applied Psycholinguistics.1993,14:177~195
  • 4[4]Singson M,Mahony D,Mann V.The relation between reading ability and morphological skills:Evidence from derivational suffixes.Reading and writing:an interdisciplinary journal.2000,12:219~252
  • 5[5]Nagy W.Relationship of morphology and other language skills to literacy skills in at-risk second-grade readers and at-risk fourthgrade writers.Journal of Educational Psychology,2003,95:730~742
  • 6[6]Ho C,Bryant S H.Phonological skills are important in learning to read Chinese,Developmental Psychology,1997,33 (6):94~951
  • 7[7]Ho S C,Lai D N.Naming-speed deficits and phonological memory deficits in Chinese developmental dyslexia.Learning and Individual Differences,1999,11 (2):173~186
  • 8[8]McBride-Chang C,Shu H,Zhou A B,et al.Morphological awareness uniquely predicts young children's Chinese character recguition.Journal of Educational Psychology,2003,95:743~751
  • 9[9]Anderson L W,Nagy R C,Zhnag H.Facets of metalinguistic awareness that contribute to Chinese literacy.In Chinese children's reading acquisition:theoretical and pedagogical issues.London:Kluwer Academic Publishers.2002
  • 10[10]Ho C S,Chan D W,Tsang S M.The cognitive profile and multiple-deficit hypotheses in Chinese developmental dyslexia.Developmental Psychology,2002,38 (4):543~553

共引文献70

同被引文献33

引证文献2

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部