期刊文献+

中美两国高速公路平面几何设计对比分析 被引量:3

Comparative Analysis on Plan Geometry Design of Expressways in China and USA
下载PDF
导出
摘要 通过对高速公路圆曲线半径、超高、缓和曲线等指标的对比分析,介绍中美规范在高速公路平面几何设计时指标选取的区别。分析表明,美国规范对于圆曲线半径取值和我国规范相近,选取的最大超高值比我国略大,缓和段的长度和超高缓和段的设置两国有较大不同。 Through comparative study on the indexes for expressway design,including circular curve radius,superelevation,and transition curve,etc,the differences that the Chinese codes and USA standards showed in choosing indexes for plan geometry design of expressways were described herein.It is indicated that in USA standards,the circular curve radius has similar values as that in Chinese codes,the maximum superelevation is slightly larger than thatin Chinese codes,and that the two countries' standards differ from each other significantly in terms of length of transition section and setting of superelevation transition.
出处 《交通科技》 2017年第3期153-155,共3页 Transportation Science & Technology
关键词 中国 美国 几何设计 对比分析 China USA geometric design comparative analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献30

  • 1韦杰深.高速公路超高缓和段的设置方法[J].广西城镇建设,2005(2):43-44. 被引量:1
  • 2彭彦忠.中美两国公路设计理念上的差异[J].中外公路,2007,27(3):7-10. 被引量:11
  • 3[1]Joel P. Leisch. Freeway and Interchange Design: A Historical Perspective. Transportation Research Record 1385. Washington. D. C., TRB National Research Council,1993.
  • 4[2]Joel P. Leisch. Geometric Design of Freeways and Interchanges. For Georgia DOT/CEC Georgia Joint Training,1997.
  • 5[3]Flexibility in Highway Design. U. S. DOT. FHWA,1997.
  • 6[4]A Policy on Geometric Design of Highway and Streets. AASHTO. Washington, D. C.,1994.
  • 7[5]Paul H. Wright, Transportation Engineering Planning and Design(Fourth Edition). New York,1998.
  • 8[6]Highway Capacity Manual. Special Report No.209. Transportation Research Board. Washington, D. C.,1994.
  • 9[7]Traffic Operation Manual. Highway Operation Volume. Texas DOT,1998.
  • 10JTG/TB05-2004.公路项目安全性评价指南[S].[S].,..

共引文献19

同被引文献3

引证文献3

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部