期刊文献+

去甲氧柔红霉素与硼替佐米治疗血液肿瘤的有效性分析

Effectiveness analysis of idarubicin and bortezomib in the treatment of hematologic malignancies
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨去甲氧柔红霉素与硼替佐米治疗血液肿瘤的有效性.方法选取我院2014年9月至2016年9月收治的77例血液肿瘤患者,随机分为参照组(39例)与研究组(38例).参照组患者给予硼替佐米治疗,研究组患者应用去甲氧柔红霉素治疗.比较分析两组患者的临床疗效及不良反应发生情况.结果研究组患者的治疗总有效率(92.11%)显著高于参照组(69.23%)(P〈0.05);研究组患者的骨髓抑制发生率显著低于参照组(P〈0.05);两组患者其他的不良反应发生率比较,差异不具有统计学意义(P〉0.05).结论在对血液肿瘤患者进行治疗时应用去甲氧柔红霉素,能够获得较为明显的治疗效果,且具有较好的安全性,值得推广. Objective To investigate the efficacy of idarubicin and bortezomib in the treatment of hematologic malignancies. Methods A total of 77 cases of patients with hematological malignancies treated in our hospital from September 2014 to September 2016 were selected, and randomly divided into reference group (39 cases) and study group (38 cases). The reference group was treated with bortezomib and the study group were treated with idarubicin. The clinical efficacy and incidence of adverse reactions were analyzed and compared between the two groups. Results The total effective rate of the study group was 92.11%, which was significantly higher than 69.23% in the reference group ( P〈0.05); the incidence rate of myelosuppression in the study group was significantly lower than that in the reference group ( P〈0.05), and there was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of other adverse events between the two groups (P〉0.05). Conclusion In the treatment of patients with hematologic malignancies, the application of idarubicin can abtain obvious treatment effect, with high safety, which is worthy of promotion.
作者 赵水平
出处 《临床研究》 2017年第4期48-49,共2页 Clinical Research
关键词 去甲氧柔红霉素 硼替佐米 血液肿瘤 idarubicin bortezomib hematologic malignancies
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献83

  • 1赵桂兰.去甲氧柔红霉素治疗难治性急性髓系白血病的疗效分析[J].内蒙古医学院学报,2005,27(5):36-37. 被引量:4
  • 2赵妍敏,吴康妮,王颖佳,吴功强,曹伟杰,于晓红,黄河.雷帕霉素协同去甲氧柔红霉素诱导人急性T淋巴细胞白血病Jurkat细胞株凋亡的作用[J].浙江大学学报(医学版),2011,40(5):482-488. 被引量:4
  • 3张立冬.4-去甲氧柔红霉素在白血病治疗中的应用[J].中华血液学杂志,1995,16(2):99-102. 被引量:13
  • 4赵淑清,李军民,沈志祥.去甲氧柔红霉素在血液肿瘤治疗中的应用[J].中华血液学杂志,2006,27(1):68-70. 被引量:12
  • 5Kumar SK, Rajkumar SV, Dispenzieri A, et al. Improved survival in multiple myeloma and the impact of novel therapies [ J ]. Blood, 2008,111(5) :2516 -2520.
  • 6Prince HM, Adena M, Smith DK, et al. Efficacy of single - agent bortezomib vs single - agent thalidomide in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma:A systematic comparisoin [ J ]. Eur J Haemato1,2007,79 (2) :93 - 99.
  • 7Mateos MV, Oriol A, Martinez Lopez J,et al. Bortezomib melpha-lan, and prednisone versus bortezomib, thalidomide, and prednisone as induction therapy followed by maintenance treatment with borte- zomib and thalidomide versus bortezomib and prednisone in elderly patients with untreated multiple myeloma : A randomised trial [ J ]. Lancet Oncol,2010,11 (10) :934 - 941.
  • 8Corthals SL, Kuiper R, Johnson DC, et al. Genetic factors underly- ing the risk of bortezomib induced peripheral neuropathy in multi- ple myeloma patients [ J ]. Haematologica, 2011,96 (11 ) : 1728 - 1732.
  • 9Richardson PG, Briemberg H, Jagannath S, et al. Frequency, char- acteristics, and reversibility of peripheral neuropathy during treat- ment of advanced multiple myeloma with bortezomib [ J ]. Clin On- col,2006,24(19) :3113 -3120.
  • 10Cavaletti G, Gilardini A, Canta A, et al. Bortezomib - induced pe- ripheral neurotoxicity:A neurophysiological and pathological study in the rat[J]. Exp Neurol,2007,204( 1 ) :317 -325.

共引文献42

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部