期刊文献+

经椎弓根定位导向骶髂螺钉治疗骨盆后环损伤的临床疗效 被引量:2

Treatment of posterior pelvic ring fracture with a sacroiliac screw through pedicle orientation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的评价经椎弓根定位导向骶髂螺钉治疗骨盆后环损伤的临床疗效。方法回顾性分析2013年10月至2016年10月经椎弓根定位导向骶髂螺钉治疗骨盆后环损伤患者的资料,其中男11例,女4例,年龄34~67岁,平均47.6岁。所有患者均在C形臂X射线机监测下经椎弓根定位并置入骶髂螺钉,末次随访时分别采用Matta评分标准和Majeed骨盆骨折康复评分评估术后骨折复位、功能恢复情况。结果所有患者手术时间31~58 min(平均40.8 min)。术中无重要血管及神经损伤,术后经骨盆正位、侧位、出口位及入口位X线检查验证所有骶髂螺钉置入位置准确,未发生突破前方骨皮质或向后进入椎管或骶孔。所有患者平均随访18.5个月,末次随访时Matta评分优12例,良3例,Majeed骨盆骨折康复评分优13例,良2例。结论经椎弓根定位导向骶髂螺钉治疗骨盆后环损伤可降低手术难度,缩短学习曲线,是一种安全有效的治疗方法。 Objective To explore the efficacy of a sacroiliac screw through pedicle orientation for treatment of the posterior pelvic ringfracture. Methods From October 2013 to October 2016,15 patients withposteriorpelvic ring fractures, undertheC-arm fluoroscopy, weretreatedwith a sacroiliac screwthroughpedicleorientation. There were 11 males and 4 females at a meanageof 47. 6 years (range,34-67 years). Fracture reduction and functional rehabilitation were evaluated with the Matta criterion and Majeed scoring at the last follow-up. Results The operation lasted for 31-58 minutes (average 40. 8 minutes). The mean fol^w-up was 18. 5 months. No vascular injury and nerveinjury occurred during the surgery,moreover,the postoperative anteroposterior,lateral inletand outletviews located within the sacrum. No screws broke the anterior bone cortex or the posterior cortex into the sacrumcanal. According to the Matta criterion, 12 cases were regarded as excellent and 3 cases good; according to the Majeed scoring, 13 cases were excellent and 2 cases good. Conclusion The sacroiliac screw through pedicle orientation is safe and effective in the treatment of posterior pelvic ring fracture with ^wertechnical demands and a shorter Earning curve.
出处 《国际骨科学杂志》 2017年第3期188-191,共4页 International Journal of Orthopaedics
基金 上海市浦东新区卫生系统重点学科建设资助项目(PWZx2014-09) 上海市卫生和计划生育委员会科研课题(201440052)
关键词 椎弓根 骶髂螺钉 导向 骨盆后环 Pedicle Sacroiliac screw Orientation Posterior pelvic ring
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献19

  • 1Stfickle U, Schaser K, Kvnig B. Image guidance in pelvic and acetabular surgery--expectations, success and limitations. Injury, 2007,38:450-462.
  • 2Gardner M J, Citak M, Kendoff D, et al. Decreased navigated drilling time using an external guide stabilising device. Injury, 2007,38:755-758.
  • 3Sttckle U, Krettek C, Pohlemann T, et al . Clinical applications- pelvis. Injury,2004,35 Suppl 1 : S-A46-56.
  • 4Citak M, Kendoff D, Kfuri M Jr, et al. Accuracy analysis of Iso- C3D versus fluoroscopy-based navigated retrograde drilling of osteochondral lesions: a pilot study. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 2007, 89 : 323-326.
  • 5Rosenberger RE, Dolati B, Larndoffer R, et al. Accuracy of minimally invasive navigated acetabular and iliosacral fracture stabilization using a targeting and noninvasive registration device. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg ,2010,130:223-230.
  • 6r ,_w_ , v Arand M, Kinzl L, Gebhard F. Computer guidance in percutaneous screw stabilization of the iliosacral joint. Clin Orthop Relat Res,2004(422) :201-207.
  • 7Hinsche AF, Giannoudis PV, Smith RM. Fluoroscopy-based multiplanar image guidance for insertion of sacroiliac screws. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2002 ( 395 ) : 135-144.
  • 8Kahler DM. Image guidance: fluoroscopic navigation. Clin Orthop Relat Res ,2004 (421) :70-76.
  • 9Leung KS, Tang N, Cheung LW, et al. Image-guided navigation in orthopaedic trauma. J Bone Joint Surg Br,2010,92:1332-1337.
  • 10Htlfnerl T, Gebhard F, Grtitzner PA, et al. Which navigation when.'?. Injury, 2004,35 Suppl 1 :S-A30-4.

共引文献8

同被引文献12

引证文献2

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部