期刊文献+

中间品区别定价行为的竞争效应与反垄断规制——基于讨价还价理论的分析

Competitive Effect of Price Discrimination in Intermediate Market and Antitrust Regulation——An Analysis based on Bargaining Theory
下载PDF
导出
摘要 随着整个产业链的主导权逐渐由上游厂商向下游厂商转移,下游厂商对市场控制能力不断上升,所具有的讨价还价能力也不断增强,进而导致上游厂商对中间品实行区别定价,并对下游弱势厂商产生"水床效应"。本文以上游垄断-下游寡头的市场结构为基准,在上下游厂商都具有一定讨价还价能力的情形下分析中间品区别定价的竞争效应。结果表明,当上游厂商选择讨价还价能力强的下游厂商进行统一定价协商时,统一定价时的消费者福利高于区别定价情形;当上游厂商选择讨价还价能力弱的下游厂商进行统一定价协商时,统一定价时的消费者福利低于区别定价情形;不论上游厂商选择强势或弱势下游厂商进行价格协商,统一定价时下游厂商的利润和社会总福利总是高于区别定价情形。因此,对中间品区别定价行为的反垄断规制应考虑到上下游厂商的讨价还价能力,应将"市场支配地位"标准延伸至"相对经济优势"。 With the dominance of whole industry chain gradually transferred from upstream manufacturers to downstream manufacturers, downstream manufacturers' ability to control the market is rising continuaUy, so downstream manufacturers' bargaining power is also growing, which will lead to the price discrimination in the intermediate market by upstream manufacturers, and have "waterbed effect" on other downstream firms. Based on the perspective of bargaining theory and the market structure of upstream monopoly-downstream oligopoly, the article analyzes the competitive effect of price discrimination in intermediate market under the circumstances of both upstream and downstream firms having some bargaining power. The results show that when the upstream firms choose the downstream firms with strong bargaining power to carry out a unified pricing negotiation, consumers' welfare under uniform pricing is higher than that under price discrimination; when upstream firms choose the downstream firms with lower bargaining power to carry out a unified pricing negotiation, consumers' welfare under uniform pricing is lower than that under price discrimination; regardless of the up- stream manufacturers choosing strong or weak downstream manufacturers to carry out price negotiation, downstream manufacturers' profits and total social welfare under unified pricing are always higher than those under price discrimination situation. Therefore, the article concludes that the antitrust regulation of price discrimination in the intermediate market should take into account upstream and downstream manufacturers' bargaining power and extend the "market dominance" standard to the "relative economic advantage".
出处 《商业研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2017年第5期137-148,共12页 Commercial Research
基金 国家社科基金青年项目 项目编号:15CJY001 湖南省社科基金项目 项目编号:14YBA203 湖南省教育厅优秀青年项目资助 湖南省社科成果评审委员会课题 项目编号:XSP17YBZC086
关键词 中间品市场 区别定价 统一定价 讨价还价 intermediate market price discrimination uniform pricing bargaining
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献35

  • 1郭跃.美国反垄断法价值取向的历史演变[J].美国研究,2005,19(1):77-93. 被引量:32
  • 2王小芳,张洁.中间产品市场价格歧视与纵向控制研究评述[J].产业经济研究,2005(6):27-36. 被引量:9
  • 3[2]海,莫里斯,著.钟鸿钧,等译.产业经济学与组织[M].北京:经济科学出版社,2001.
  • 4[4]Armstrong,M.,Chris D.and J.Vickers(1993),Price Discrmination,Competiton and Regulation.The Journal of industrial Economics 41 (4):335-359.
  • 5[5]DeGraba,P.(1990),Input Market Price Discrimination and the Choice of Technology.the American Economic Review80(5):1246-1253.
  • 6[6]Gerstner,E.,J.D.Hess and D.M.Holthausen (1994),Price Discrimination through a Distribution Channel:Theory and Evidence.American Economic Review.84 (5):1437-45.
  • 7[7]Haucap,J.and C.Wey (2004),Input Price Discrimination (Bans),Entry and Welfare.www.diw.de/english/produkte/veranstaltungen/earie2004/papers/docs/2004-285-V01.pdf.
  • 8[8]Katz,M.L(1987),The Welfare Effects of Third-Degree Price Discrimination in Intermediate Goods Markets.the American Economic Review 77(1):154-167.
  • 9[9]King,S.P.(1999),Price Discrimination,Separation and Access:Protecting Competition or Protecting Competitors?Australian Journal of Management 24(1):21-35.
  • 10[10]Long,N.V.and A.Soubeyran(1999),Input Price Discrimination,Access Pricing,and Bypass.CIRANO Working Paper.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部