期刊文献+

初步探讨乳腺硬化性腺病超声分类的应用价值 被引量:5

Preliminary investigate on the application value of the ultrasonic classification in breast sclerosing adenosis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的 :探讨彩色多普勒超声在乳腺硬化性腺病(SA)的超声分类的价值。方法 :回顾性分析2010年1月-2015年12月23例乳腺SA的术前彩色多普勒超声图像,对病灶的内部回声、边界、周围高回声晕、钙化灶、形态、边缘以及内部Adler血流分级进行分析,并与病理结果进行对照分析。初步归纳分类为局限型SA(LSA)与结节形成型SA(TSA)。结果:(1)LSA患者的平均年龄小于TSA;(2)SA患者误诊为恶性病变达21.74%;(3)在周围高回声声晕、钙化灶和内部血流上的检出率差异无统计学意义(P分别0.812、0.584、0.606,P>0.05);在内部回声、形态、边缘、边界的检出率差异有统计学意义(P分别为0.000、0.000、0.001、0.034,P<0.05)。结论 :进一步提高对乳腺SA超声分型的声像图认识,对乳腺SA的诊断与鉴别诊断具有重要价值。 Objective: To investigate the classificatory value of color doppler uhrasonography in breast sclerosing adenosis (SA). Methods: Preoperative sonography of 23 SA patients (pathological confirmed) from January 2010 to December 2015 were retrospectively analyzed. SA lesions were classified as localized sclerosing adenosis (LSA) or tuberous sclerosing adenosis(TSA). Results: (1)The average age of LSA group was younger than TSA; (2)21.74% SA patients were misdiagnosed as malignant lesions; (3)The detective rates of acoustic halo, focal calcification and the internal blood flow between two SA groups had no statistical significant differences (P=0.812, 0.584, 0.606, P〉0.05). Meanwhile, there were statistical significant differences in internal echo, shape and margin border between two SA groups(P=0.000, 0.000, 0.001, 0.034, P〈0.05). Conclusion: Further analyzation of characteristic signs from color Doppler ultrasonography is useful in classification of LAS and TAS.
出处 《中国临床医学影像杂志》 北大核心 2017年第5期324-326,共3页 Journal of China Clinic Medical Imaging
关键词 乳腺疾病 超声检查 多普勒 彩色 Breast diseases Uhrasonography, Doppler, color
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献43

  • 1付丽,傅西林.乳腺病理诊断中的陷阱之一:硬化性大汗腺腺病[J].临床与实验病理学杂志,2004,20(3):261-263. 被引量:6
  • 2谢坪,何远智,付凯,黄灵敏.乳腺癌X线表现分析[J].实用放射学杂志,2006,22(3):346-348. 被引量:33
  • 3徐开埜.乳腺疾病影像诊断与治疗学[M].上海:上海科技教育出版社,1996.89.
  • 4武忠弼 杨光华主编.中华外科病理学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2002.646.
  • 5Gunhan -Bilgen I, Memis A, Ostun EE, et al. Sclerosing adenosis: mammographic and ultrasonographic findings with clinical and histopathological correlation [ J ]. EJR ,2002,44 ( 3 ) :232 - 238.
  • 6Gill HK,Loffe OB,Berg WA. When is a diagnosis of sclerosing adenosis acceptable at core biopsy? [J]. Radiology,2003,228( 1 ) :50 - 57.
  • 7American College of Radiology. Breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS)-Ultrasouud[M]. Reston: American College of Radiology, 2003.
  • 8Adler DD, Carson PL, Rubin JM, et al. Doppler ultrasound color flow imaging in the study of breast cancer: preliminary findings[J]. Ultrasound Med Biol, 1990, 16(6): 553-559.
  • 9Gilnhan-Bilgen I, Memi A, Ustiin EE, et al. Sclerosing adenosis: mammographic and ultrasouographic findings with clinical and histopathological correlation[J]. Eur J Radiol, 2002, 44(3): 232-238.
  • 10Sreedharanunni S, Das A, Veenu S, et al. Nodular sclerosing adenosis of breast: A diagnostic pitfall in fine needle aspiration cytology[J]. J Cytol, 2013, 30(1): 49-51.

共引文献48

同被引文献24

引证文献5

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部