摘要
目的评价肠折叠术联合早期肠内营养在空肠闭锁患儿加速康复外科中应用的临床意义。方法回顾性分析2005年1月至2014年1月南京医科大学附属儿童医院收治的58例空肠闭锁患儿术前、术中和术后恢复过程的临床资料。根据手术方法,将患儿分为肠管端端吻合术(端端吻合组,18例)、在肠吻合基础上加近端肠折叠术(肠折叠术组,19例)和肠折叠术联合早期肠内营养(EEN)(肠折叠术联合EEN组,21例),比较组患儿的胎龄、出生体质量、伴发疾病、手术年龄和手术时间、住院时间、全静脉营养持续时间、肠功能恢复时间(术后经口喂养时间、术后经口喂养达150 ml·kg-1·d-1的时间)以及是否需再手术等方面的差异。结果3组患儿的胎龄、出生体质量、伴发疾病和手术年龄比较,差异无统计学意义(均P 〉 0.05)。肠折叠术组与端端吻合组比较,住院时间[(19.3 ± 4.4)d比(22.7 ± 3.1)d,P 〈 0.05]、术后经口喂养时间[(9.8 ± 3.3)d比(12.5 ± 3.0)d,P 〈 0.05]、术后经口喂养达150 ml·kg-1·d-1的时间[(18.5 ± 4.1)d比(21.5 ± 2.5)d,P 〈 0.05]和全静脉营养持续时间[(13.1 ± 2.9)d比(15.0 ± 2.3)d,P 〈 0.05]均显著缩短;肠折叠术联合EEN组与肠折叠术组比较,术后经口喂养时间[(7.7 ± 2.2)d比(9.8 ± 3.3)d,P 〈 0.05]、术后经口喂养达150 ml·kg-1·d-1的时间[(14.8 ± 2.5)d比(18.5 ± 4.1)d,P 〈 0.05]、全静脉营养持续时间[(9.5 ± 3.0)d比(13.1 ± 2.9)d,P 〈 0.05]和住院时间[(15.3 ± 3.5)d比(19.3 ± 4.4)d,P 〈 0.05]均显著缩短。结论肠折叠术联合早期肠内营养有助于早期利用肠道功能,提早进入经口喂养时间,减少静脉营养的使用,加速患儿康复。
ObjectiveTo evaluate the efficacy of bowel plication combined with early enteral nutrition (EEN) in the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) of jejunal atresia (JA) neonates.MethodsBetween January 2005 and January 2014, 58 neonates with JA underwent surgical treatment in Children′s Hospital of Nanjing Medical University. Their clinical data, including operation procedures, ages, birth weight, concomitant diseases, age at surgery, hospital stay, total parenteral nutrition (TPN) , postoperative intestinal function recovery (the time to the first oral feeding and the time to oral feeding volume reaching 150 ml·kg-1·d-1) , complications and reoperation, were retrospectively analyzed.
ResultsAccording to the surgical procedures, the 58 neonates were divided into three groups: control group (18 cases, undergoing atretic segments resection and primary anastomosis) , bowel plication group (19 cases, undergoing bowel plication after atretic segments resection and primary anastomosis) and bowel plication combined with EEN group (21 cases, undergoing bowel plication combined with EEN) . No significant differences of ages, birth weight, age at operation, and concomitant diseases were found among 3 groups (all P 〉 0.05) . The time of hospital stay, the time to the first oral feeding, the time to oral feeding volume reaching 150 ml·kg-1·d-1, and the time of TPN in bowel plication group were significantly shorter than those of control group [ (19.3 ± 4.4) d vs. (22.7 ± 3.1) d, t= 2.696, P= 0.011; (9.8 ± 3.3) d vs. (12.5 ± 3.0) d, t= 2.630, P= 0.013; (18.5 ± 4.1) d vs. (21.5 ± 2.5) d, t= 2.726, P= 0.011; (13.1 ± 2.9) d vs. (15.0 ± 2.3) d, t= 2.219, P= 0.033]. However, above parameters of bowel plication combined with EEN group were significantly shorter than those of bowel plication group[ (15.3 ± 3.5) d vs. (19.3 ± 4.4) , t= 4.120, P= 0.003; (7.7 ± 2.2) d vs. (9.8 ± 3.3) d, t= 2.428, P= 0.020; (14.8 ± 2.5) d vs. (18.5 ± 4.1) d, t= 3.752, P= 0.001; (9.5 ± 3.0) vs. (13.1 ± 2.9) d, t= 4.370, P= 0.000].ConclusionThe bowel plication combined with EEN contributes to the early use of intestinal function, shorten the time to the first oral feeding, and reduces the use of TPN, which can improve the recovery of jejunal atresia neonates.
出处
《中华胃肠外科杂志》
CAS
CSCD
北大核心
2017年第5期535-539,共5页
Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery
基金
南京市医学科技发展项目(ZKX14014,201405014)