揭开宪法“国家所有”的面纱——《宪法》文本中两种不同类型的“国家所有”

Piercing the Veil of State-ownership in Constitution:Two Different Types of State-ownership in the Constitutional Text

既有关于现行宪法中"国家所有"性质的研究因未能区分宪法文本中两种不同类型的"国家所有"而未能揭示宪法"国家所有"的真实含义。《宪法》第9条和第10条中的"国家所有"分别代表两种不同性质的国家所有:前者属于"全民所有型"的"国家所有",是全民所有制的组成部分,是宪法的一种价值选择和政治决断,是有待立法形成的制度框架;后者是"非全民所有型"的"国家所有",是属于非基本权利的民法所有权。在"全民所有型"的"国家所有"的部门法实现方面,各部门法应该根据自身的功能、调整范围、方式,运用自身的概念和立法技术自主地进行制度设计。但各部门法的制度设计应该彼此协调,避免冲突,合力助推"全民所有型"的"国家所有"价值目标的实现。

its failure in dis Previous research fails to reveal the true meaning of state-ownership in the Constitution, due to tinguishing two types of state-ownership in the constitutional text. The state-ownership stipulated in article 9 and 10 of the Constitution of the People＇s Republic of China represents two different types of state- ownership. The former belongs to the ownership by the whole people, reflecting the value selection and political decision made by the Constitution. It＇s institutional framework needs further legislation. The later, on the contrary, is not the ownership of the whole people, but a proprietary right of non-fundamental sense in civil law. The sector laws ought to set up specific rules to realize the state-ownership which belongs to the whole people according to their own characteristics, in a way of coordination and harmony.