期刊文献+

Monitoring Changes in Hepatic Venous Velocities Flow after a Fluid Challenge Can Identify Shock Patients Who Lack Fluid Responsiveness 被引量:1

Monitoring Changes in Hepatic Venous Velocities Flow after a Fluid Challenge Can Identify Shock Patients Who Lack Fluid Responsiveness
原文传递
导出
摘要 Background: Evaluating the hemodynamic status and predicting fluid responsiveness are important in critical ultrasound assessment of shock patients. Transthoracic echocardiography with noninvasive diagnostic parameters allows the assessment of volume responsiveness. This study aimed to assess tile hemodynamic changes in the liver and systemic hemodynamic changes during fluid challenge and during passive leg raising (PLR) by measuring hepatic venous flow (HVF) velocity. Methods: This is an open-label study in a tertiary teaching hospital. Shock patients with hypoperfusion who required fluid challenge were selected for the study. Patients 〈l 8 years old and those with contraindications to PLR were excluded from the study. Baseline values were measured, PLR tests were performed, and 500 ml of saline was infused over 30 rain. Parameters associated with cardiac output (CO) in the left ventricular outflow tract were measured using the Doppler method. In addition, HVF velocity and right ventricular function parameters were determined. Results: Middle hepatic venous (MHV) S-wave velocity was positively correlated in all patients with CO at baseline (r= 0.706, P〈 0.01 ) and after volume expansion (r= 0.524, P = 0.003). CO was also significantly correlated with MHV S-wave velocity in responders (r = 0.608, P 〈 0.01). During PLR, however, hepatic venous S-wave velocity did not correlate with CO. For the parameter AMHV D (increase in change in MHV D-wave velocity after volume expansion), defined as (MHV D - MHV Dtaseline)/MHV DBaseli.,e x 100%, 〉21% indicated no fluid responsiveness, with a sensitivity of 100%, a specificity of 71.2%, and an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.918. Conclusions: During fluid expansion, hepatic venous S-wave velocity can be used to monitor CO, whether or not it is increasing. AMHV D 〉21% indicated a lack of fluid responsiveness, thus helping to decide when to stop infusions. Background: Evaluating the hemodynamic status and predicting fluid responsiveness are important in critical ultrasound assessment of shock patients. Transthoracic echocardiography with noninvasive diagnostic parameters allows the assessment of volume responsiveness. This study aimed to assess tile hemodynamic changes in the liver and systemic hemodynamic changes during fluid challenge and during passive leg raising (PLR) by measuring hepatic venous flow (HVF) velocity. Methods: This is an open-label study in a tertiary teaching hospital. Shock patients with hypoperfusion who required fluid challenge were selected for the study. Patients 〈l 8 years old and those with contraindications to PLR were excluded from the study. Baseline values were measured, PLR tests were performed, and 500 ml of saline was infused over 30 rain. Parameters associated with cardiac output (CO) in the left ventricular outflow tract were measured using the Doppler method. In addition, HVF velocity and right ventricular function parameters were determined. Results: Middle hepatic venous (MHV) S-wave velocity was positively correlated in all patients with CO at baseline (r= 0.706, P〈 0.01 ) and after volume expansion (r= 0.524, P = 0.003). CO was also significantly correlated with MHV S-wave velocity in responders (r = 0.608, P 〈 0.01). During PLR, however, hepatic venous S-wave velocity did not correlate with CO. For the parameter AMHV D (increase in change in MHV D-wave velocity after volume expansion), defined as (MHV D - MHV Dtaseline)/MHV DBaseli.,e x 100%, 〉21% indicated no fluid responsiveness, with a sensitivity of 100%, a specificity of 71.2%, and an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.918. Conclusions: During fluid expansion, hepatic venous S-wave velocity can be used to monitor CO, whether or not it is increasing. AMHV D 〉21% indicated a lack of fluid responsiveness, thus helping to decide when to stop infusions.
出处 《Chinese Medical Journal》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2017年第10期1202-1210,共9页 中华医学杂志(英文版)
关键词 Fluid Challenge Hepatic Venous Flow Venous Return Fluid Challenge Hepatic Venous Flow Venous Return
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献15

  • 1Dellinger RP,Levy MM,Cadet JM,Bion J Parker MM Jaeschke R. Surviving Sepsis Campaign:international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock:2008[J].{H}CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE,2008.296-327.
  • 2Miehard F,Teboul JL. Predicting fluid responsiveness in ICU patients:a critical analysis of the evidence[J].{H}CHEST,2002.2000-2008.
  • 3Cavallaro F,Sandroni C,Marano C,La Torre G Mannocci A De Waure C. Diagnostic accuracy of passive leg raising for prediction of fluid responsiveness in adults:systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical studies[J].{H}Intensive Care Medicine,2010.1975-1483.
  • 4Monge García MI,Gil Cano A,Díaz Monrové JC. Brachial artery peak velocity variation to predict fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients[J].{H}CRITICAL CARE,2009.R142.
  • 5Zimmermann M,Feibicke T,Keyl C,Prasser C Moritz S Graf BM. Accuracy of stroke volume variation compared with pleth variability index to predict fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients undergoing major surgery[J].{H}European Journal of Anaesthesiology,2010.555-561.
  • 6Hofer CK,Senn A,Weibel L,Zollinger A. Assessment of stroke volume variation for prediction of fluid responsiveness using the modified FloTracTM and PiCCOplusTM system[J].{H}CRITICAL CARE,2008.82.
  • 7Levy MM,Fink MP,Marshall JC,Abraham E Angus D Cook D. 2001 SCCM/ESICM/ACCP/ATS/SIS International Sepsis Definitions Conference[J].{H}Intensive Care Medicine,2003.530-538.
  • 8Marik PE,Baram M,Vahid B. Does central venous pressure predict fluid responsiveness A systematic review of the literature and the tale of seven mares[J].{H}CHEST,2008.172-178.
  • 9Marik PE,Cavallazzi R,Vasu T. Dynamic changes in arterial waveform derived variables and fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients:a systematic review of the literature[J].{H}CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE,2009.2642-2647.
  • 10Monnet X,Rienzo M,Osman D,Anguel N Richard C Pinsky MR. Passive leg raising predicts fluid responsiveness in the critically ill[J].{H}CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE,2006.1402-1407.

共引文献10

同被引文献2

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部