期刊文献+

金融性财产冻结的权益冲突与分配研究 被引量:4

A Study on the Interests Conflict and Distribution of Frozen Financial Property
原文传递
导出
摘要 当代经济被称为金融经济,它是以流动性和效率性为核心的经济,财产权利中的行为性权利在某种意义上比归属性权利更重要,是保障财产价值增加或损失减少的核心权利。但是,在我国目前财产冻结的法规中,并没有区分金融性财产和消费性财产,将财产的价值性权利与行为性权利一并冻结。虽然在近期的规定中对此有所考虑,但还没有将其作为原理性问题进行统一规定。[1]这不仅侵犯了当事人的财产权益,同时给其带来了潜在的财产损失,甚至出现了导致许多企业破产、引发群体性事件等不良社会效果的现象。因此,在当代社会必须充分认识到财产的行为性权利,在行政机关、监管机关、司法机关和财产权利人之间合理分配冻结权益,以实现社会综合效果的最优化。 The modern economy is called financial economy;the core of this economy is the liquidity and efficiency.In the property rights,the right of action is more important than ownership in a sense.It is the core right to guarantee the increase or decrease of the value of property.However,China’s current laws and regulations on frozen property do not distinguish between financial property and consumer property.Besides,it freezes all the rights about ownership and action right together.Although it has been considered in recent regulations,it has not been unified and prescribed as a principle problem.It not only violates the property rights and interests,but also brings the potential property losses,and even leads to many enterprises bankruptcy,causing mass incidents and other bad social effects.Therefore,in contemporary society,we must fully recognize the action rights of property,and rationally distribute rights and interests of frozen property among the administrative organs,regulatory authorities,the judiciary and the property ownership order to achieve the optimization of the social effect.
作者 刘少军
机构地区 中国政法大学
出处 《中国政法大学学报》 CSSCI 2017年第3期103-117,共15页 Journal Of CUPL
基金 2014年度国家社会科学基金批准重大项目--"开放经济条件下我国虚拟经济安全运行法律保障研究"(项目批准号:14ZDB148)的阶段性研究成果
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献20

共引文献53

引证文献4

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部