期刊文献+

中国污水处理公私合作改革的国际经验、模式选择与监管政策 被引量:3

International Experience,Model Selection and Regulatory Policy of Public Private Partnerships(PPP) in China's Sewage Treatment Industry
下载PDF
导出
摘要 污水处理公私合作改革的国际经验以英国的私有化模式、美国的市场融资模式和法国的特许权模式最为典型。污水处理行业的产权、融资、运营、竞争、价格等模式的选择不同于早期的公私合作探索,深深地影响着中国污水处理公私合作改革的进展和成效,必须系统设计、整体推进。具体而言,产权模式由放开产权向转让经营权转变;融资模式由间接融资向直接融资转变;运营模式由厂网分离向厂网一体转变;竞争模式由分散竞争向垄断竞争转变;价格模式由使用者付费向政府购买服务转变。为保障公众利益,在污水处理公私合作改革过程中,必须建立健全公私合作监管机构、加强过程监管,同时规范公私合作协议,强化合同管理。 According to the world revolution of public private partnerships(PPP) in sewage treatment industry, the privatization model in UK, the market financing model in United States and the franchise model in France are the most typical. The sewage treatment industry property, financing, operation, competition, price and other specific mode selection will greatly affect the PPP reform progress and effectiveness in China. The sewage treatment industry property, financing, operation, competition, price and other specific mode selection will greatly affect the PPP reform progress and effectiveness in China.Specifically, the property model will be changed from release property to the management right transfer, financing mode from indirect financing to direct financing, operation mode from the factory network to factory network integration,competition mode from decentralized competition to monopoly competition, price model from user charges to purchase of services. In order to protect the public interest, in the process of the reform of public and private cooperation in sewage treatment, it is necessary to establish and improve the public and private cooperation regulatory agencies, strengthen the process of supervision, and standardize the public-private partnership agreement, strengthen contract management.
出处 《浙江社会科学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2017年第5期36-42,共7页 Zhejiang Social Sciences
基金 浙江省哲学社会科学规划优势学科重大资助项目"城市水安全与水务行业监管体制研究"(14YSXK02ZD) 主持人:王俊豪
关键词 污水处理 公私合作 改革模式 监管 sewage treatment PPP models of reform regulation
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献88

  • 1王凤武.对优先发展城市公共交通战略的思考[J].现代城市轨道交通,2005(6):1-3. 被引量:10
  • 2刘雪梅,何逢标.基于成本性态与CVP法的污水处理企业经济分析[J].中国给水排水,2006,22(14):83-85. 被引量:5
  • 3[比]热若尔·罗兰.转型与经济学[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2002..
  • 4Shley, Jon, and Bernard. Handbook for Evaluating Infrastructure Regulatory Systems[R]. World Bank, 2006.
  • 5Paul L. Joskow. Markets for Power in the United States: An Interim Assessment[J]. The Energy Journal, 2006, 27(1).
  • 6OECD. Regulatory Policies in OECD Countries: From Interventionism to Regulatory Governance[R]. 2002.
  • 7OECD. Report on Experiences with the Structural Separation[R]. 2006.
  • 8Pablo Arocena. Cost and Quality Gains from Diversification and Vertical Integration in the Electricity industry: A DEA approach [J]. Energy Economics, 2008, (30).
  • 9Sam Peltzman and Clifford Winston. Deregulation of Network Industries: What's Next [R]. Brookings Institution, Washington, D.C. 2001.
  • 10World Bank. Reforming Infrastructure: Privatization, Regulation, and Competition [R]. A World Bank Policy Research Report, 2004.

共引文献134

同被引文献27

引证文献3

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部