期刊文献+

家庭医生责任制下社区糖尿病家庭分类管理效果评价 被引量:10

Evaluation of Community Diabetes Family Classification Management under the Responsibility System of Family Doctors
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的评价家庭医生责任制下社区糖尿病家庭分类管理效果,为社区糖尿病管理提供依据。方法在2015年选择龙华街道2型糖尿病患者320人为研究对象,随机分成干预组和对照组,干预组实施家庭医生制服务下糖尿病家庭分类管理模式管理1年,用SPSS 20.0统计软件对干预后两组糖尿病患者相关实验室指标,以及糖尿病健康知识知晓率、规律血糖监测率、规律日常运动率和平均每日的医疗费用支出情况进行分析。结果干预组的收缩压、空腹血糖,糖化血糖蛋白、甘油三酯均有所下降,和对照组相比有统计学意义(P<0.05);干预组患者对糖尿病健康相关知识、态度认知以及健康行为依从性和对医师服务满意度均比对照组高,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01);平均每日医疗费支出干预组低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。结论社区糖尿病患者通过家庭医生责任制下的糖尿病家庭分类管理,能够提高糖尿病患者健康知识知晓率、健康行为依从性和对医师服务满意度,并随着糖尿病患者良好生活方式的形成使得糖尿病病情能够得到良好的控制,从而降低医疗费用支出。 Objective To evaluate the effect of community diabetes management under the responsibility system of family doctors, and to provide the basis for community diabetes management. Methods 320 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in Longhua Street were randomly divided into intervention group and control group in 2015. The community classification management of diabetes under the responsibility system of family doctors had been applied in the intervention group for one year. SPSS20.0 statistical software was used to compare the two groups of patients with diabetes and diabetes -related laboratory index, the awareness rate of health knowledge, regular blood glucose monitoring rate, regular daily exercise rate and average daily medical expenses. Results The biochemical parameters of intervention group including the systolic blood pressure, fasting blood glucose, glycosylated glycoprotein and triglyceride had been effectively controlled, which were significantly different from control group ( P 〈 0.05 ). The knowledge, attitude, health behavior and satisfaction of patients in the intervention group were higher than those in the control group, which were significantly different between the two groups(P 〈0. 01). The average daily medical expense of the intervention group was significanthy lower than the control group (P 〈0.01). Conclusion Community diabetes classification management under responsibility system of family doctors can improve the health awareness of patients with diabetes, their compliance and satisfaction with doctors' service, and with the formation of good lifes-tyle. Diabetic patients can get better control of their glucose and reduce their medical expenses.
作者 陈志刚 许苹
出处 《解放军医院管理杂志》 2017年第4期336-339,共4页 Hospital Administration Journal of Chinese People's Liberation Army
基金 2013年度上海市卫生和计划生育委员会委科研项目(20134482)
关键词 家庭医生责任制 糖尿病 效果评价 家庭分类管理 responsibility system of family doctors diabetes evaluation family classification management
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献29

  • 1武阳丰,谢高强,李莹,赵连成,周北凡.中国部分中年人群糖尿病患病率、知晓率、治疗率及控制率现况调查[J].中华流行病学杂志,2005,26(8):564-568. 被引量:152
  • 2罗红,朱红艳,龚建,刘学菊,肖又姑.糖尿病患者运动行为的干预策略与效果评价[J].中国实用护理杂志,2007,23(6):11-12. 被引量:45
  • 3.中国城市统计年鉴[M].北京:中国统计出版社,2000..
  • 4李立明主编.流行病学:第四版[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2000,8.254-267.
  • 5袁丽.糖尿病健康教育发展现状[J].实用医院临床杂志,2007,4(5):20-22. 被引量:8
  • 6Yang W, Lu J, Weng J. Prevalence of diabetes among men and women in China [J]. New England Journal of Medicine, 2010, 362(12):1090-1101.
  • 7NCD Risk Factor Collaboration (NCD-RisC). Effects of diabetes definition on global surveillance of diabetes prevalence and diagnosis : a pooled analysis of 96 population-based studies with 331 288 participants [J]. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol, 2015, 3 (8) :624-637. DOI: 10.1016/$2213-8587( 15)00129-1.
  • 8Xu Y, Wang LM, He J, et al. Prevalence and control of diabetes in Chinese adults [J]. JAMA, 2013,310 (9) : 948-959. DOI.10. 1001/jama.2013.168118.
  • 9Ha KH, Kim DJ. Trends in the diabetes epidemic in Korea [J]. Endocrinol Metab, 2015, 30 (2) : 142-146. DOI: 10.3803/EnM. 2015.30.2.142.
  • 10Langenberg C, Sharp S J, Franks PW, et al. Gene-lifestyle interaction and type 2 diabetes.the EPIC interact case-cohort study [J]. PLoS Med, 2014, 11 (5) : e1001647. DOI:10.1371/ j ournal.pmed. 1001647.

共引文献277

同被引文献65

引证文献10

二级引证文献28

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部