期刊文献+

圆形和方形配筋钢管混凝土短柱受压性能比较 被引量:5

Comparison in compression performance of circular and square RCFT short columns
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为了研究圆形和方形配筋钢管混凝土柱受压性能,对圆形和方形的中空钢管柱、素混凝土钢管柱及配筋钢管混凝土柱共30个试件进行了轴压试验,在混凝土截面积、钢管截面积和钢筋截面积稍有差别的条件下,对圆形和方形柱试件的承载力、变形性能、合成效果以及破坏模式进行了对比分析.结果表明,圆钢管混凝土柱的承载力高,变形性能好,受压性能比方钢管混凝土柱更优越;就破坏模式而言,和圆钢管混凝土柱相比,方钢管混凝土柱对于屈曲变形更为有利. In order to study the compression performance of reinforced concrete-filled steel tube (RCFT) columns, the axial compression experiments were performed for 30 specimens including circular and square hollow steel tube columns, concrete filled steel tube (CFT) columns and RCFT columns. Under the condition that the cross section area of concrete, steel tube and reinforcement has a slight difference, the bearing capacity, deformation performance, synthetic effect and failure mode of circular and square column specimens were compared and analyzed. The results show that the circular cFr columns have higher bearing capacity, better deformation performance and more excellent compression performance than the square CFT columns. For the failure mode, the square CFT columns are superior to the circular CFlr columns in the aspect of buckling deformation.
出处 《沈阳工业大学学报》 EI CAS 北大核心 2017年第3期352-356,共5页 Journal of Shenyang University of Technology
基金 沈阳市科技计划项目(F16-205-1-09)
关键词 受压性能 配筋钢管混凝土柱 素混凝土钢管柱 截面面积 压缩试验 承载力 延性系数 破坏模式 compression performance tube column cross sectionfailure modereinforced concrete-filledarea compression test steel tube column bearing capacity concrete filled steelductility coefficient
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献88

共引文献64

同被引文献37

引证文献5

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部