期刊文献+

社区共管:公众环境权与居民生存权的权衡 被引量:7

The Co-Management:Balance Public's Environment Power and Residents' Right to Survival
下载PDF
导出
摘要 传统的自然保护区管理模式通过对保护区居民采伐、捕猎等行为的禁止及活动空间的限制,实现对自然保护区的管控。实践证明,这种管控机制在维护公众环境权的同时,也损害了保护区社区居民的生存权,使得保护区管理机构与社区居民的紧张关系不断升级。社区共管则兼顾公众的环境权和居民的生存权,一方面通过吸收保护区社区居民参与保护管理,提高管理效能,以保证自然保护区环境生态功能的实现;另一方面通过开发保护区资源,改善保护区的民生,以满足保护区社区居民生存权的需求,从而缓和保护区管理机构与社区居民的紧张关系。社区共管优势明显,势必将成为自然保护区管理模式发展的方向。 The traditional management mode of natural conservation area realized the control of natural conservation area byway of banning cutting, catching and hunting and other behaviors and limiting the space of movement. Practice shows thatthis mechanism of management protected the public environmental right, but at the same time it damaged the residents' livingrights in the natural conservation area. It made the relation between the management organization and the residents nervous.The community co-management realizes both the public environmental right and the resident's living rights. On the one hand, itenhances the efficiency of management by way of absorbing residents in the natural conservation area to take part in the activityof management; on the other hand, it explores the resource in natural conservation area to improve the people's livelihood, so asto satisfy the demand of the resident's living right and mitigate the tense relation between the management organization and theresidents. The advantages of the community co-management are evident, and it will become the leading mode of management inthe natural conservation area.
作者 胡伟
出处 《生态经济》 北大核心 2017年第6期212-215,220,共5页 Ecological Economy
基金 国家社会科学基金项目"自然保护区社区共管法律机制研究"(12BFX123)
关键词 社区共管 生存权 环境权 community co-management living right environmental right
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献19

共引文献39

同被引文献144

引证文献7

二级引证文献59

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部