期刊文献+

1%罗哌卡因应用于硬膜外麻醉下剖宫产手术的可行性研究 被引量:1

Feasibility study of 1% ropivacaine used for epidural anesthesia on cesarean section
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:以0.75%盐酸罗哌卡因注射液为对照,研究1%盐酸罗哌卡因注射液在剖宫产手术患者中实施硬膜外麻醉的可行性。方法:随机入组40例患者,均分为1%盐酸罗哌卡因注射液组(研究组,S)和0.75%盐酸罗哌卡因注射液组(对照组,C)。观察两组患者术前感觉阻滞上界达T6时间、感觉阻滞范围,术后感觉阻滞消失时间、手术医师满意度。结果:S组与C组比较,切皮时VAS的评分比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);S组的起效时间快于C组,镇痛的持续时间长于C组(P<0.05);与C组比较,S组的牵拉不适反应少、肌肉松弛的满意度高(P<0.05);研究药物对新生儿的脐动脉血PH值和Apgar评分的影响两组差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:1%盐酸罗哌卡因注射液应用于硬膜外麻醉下实施剖宫产术安全有效。 Objective Compared with 0. 7 5 % Ropivacaine Hydrochloride Injection, to investigate the feasibility of epidural anesthesia in 1% patients undergoing cesarean section with Ropivacaine Hydrochloride Injection. Method Forty patients were randomly divided into 1% ropivacaine hydrochloride injection group (study group,S) and 0. 7 5 % ropivacaine hydrochloride in-jection group ( control group , C ). To observe the two groups of patients with preoperative sensory block upper bound of T6 , sensory block scope, the postoperative feeling disappear time block, the surgeon satisfaction. Results There was no significant difference in the score of VAS between the S group and the C group (P 〉0. 05) ; onset time of group S was faster than group C,duration of analgesia was longer than group C ( P 〈 0. 05 ) ; and group C compared with group S , the dragging pain reaction of the group S was less,muscle relaxation of satisfaction was higher ( P 〈0. 05 ) for the operation doctor;There was no significant difference between the two groups in the study of umbilical artery blood pH and Apgar score of neonates ( P 〉 0. 05 ). Conclusion The 1 % Ropiva-caine Hydrochloride Injection used in epidural anesthesia is safe and effective of cesarean section.
出处 《吉林医学》 CAS 2017年第6期1031-1032,共2页 Jilin Medical Journal
关键词 1%罗哌卡因 硬膜外麻醉 剖宫产术 可行性 1 % Ropivacaine Epidural anesthesia Cesarean section Feasibility
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献16

  • 1易三平,喻宏,孟庆新,姚尚龙.罗比卡因硬膜外阻滞行剖宫产时胎儿脐静脉血及产妇静脉血血药浓度的观察[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2005,21(11):771-772. 被引量:5
  • 2McClure JH. Ropivacaine. Br J Anaesth, 1996,76:300-307.
  • 3Feldman HS, Arthur GR, Covino BG. Comparateve systemic toxicity of convulsant and supraconvulsant doses of intravenous ropivacaine, bupivacaine, lidocaine in the conscious dog. Anesth Analg, 1989,69:794-801.
  • 4Scott DB, Lee A, Fagan D, et al. Acute toxicity of ropivacaine compared with that of bupivacaine. Anesth Analg, 1989, 69: 563 -569.
  • 5Brockway MS, Bannister J, McClure JH, et al. Comparison of tradural ropivacaine and bupivacaine. Br J Anesth, 1991,66: 31-37.
  • 6Krone SC ,Chan VW,Regan J, et al. Analgesic effects of low-dose ropivacaine for interscalene brachial plexus block for outpatient shoulder surgery- a dose-finding study. Reg Anesth pain Med, 2001,26:439.
  • 7Vester-Andersen T, Husum B, Lindeburg T, et al. Perlvascular axillary block IV, block following 40,50,60 ral of mepivacaine 1% with adrenaline. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand, 1984,28:99-105.
  • 8Khstad O,Smedby,Thompson G. Distribution of local anesthetic in axillary brachial plexus block : a clinical and magnetic resonance imaging study. Anesthesiology ,2002,96 : 1315-1324.
  • 9徐铭军.2009麻醉学新进展[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2009:556-557.
  • 10Mc Donald S B,Anesth,1999年,90卷,971页

共引文献20

同被引文献11

引证文献1

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部