摘要
目的 :探讨替格瑞洛对急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)后血小板聚集功能的影响。方法 :选取2015-01至2015-12在我院心血管内科接受PCI的ACS患者98例,单盲条件下随机数字法分为氯吡格雷组48例和替格瑞洛组50例。氯吡格雷组首次口服300 mg氯吡格雷后,以75 mg/qd维持;替格瑞洛组首次口服180 mg替格瑞洛后,以90 mg/bid维持。通过流式细胞术检测两组患者药物治疗前及PCI后24 h、7 d、1个月时血小板内血管扩张剂激磷蛋白(VASP)磷酸化水平及血小板反应性指数(PRI)。随访统计术后1个月内主要不良心血管事件(MACE)及出血事件的发生情况。比较两组术后血小板聚集功能及MACE、出血事件发生率。结果 :替格瑞洛组和氯吡格雷组性别、平均年龄、体重指数,有吸烟史、高血压、高血脂、冠心病家族史患者比例,左心室射血分数、用药情况、疾病分类及实验室资料比较,差异均无统计学意义(P均>0.05)。两组冠状动脉造影显示血管病变数量及置入支架数量比较,差异均无统计学意义(P均>0.05)。两组间PRI总体均数比较,差异有统计学意义(F_(组别)=103.9,P<0.001)。两组内药物治疗前、术后24 h、术后7 d、术后1个月各时间点PRI总体均数比较,差异均有统计学意义(F_(时间)=894.2,P<0.001)。组间和时间点对PRI的影响存在交互作用(F_(交互)=147.6,P<0.001)。两组PCI术后24 h、7 d、1个月各时间点PRI≥50%所占百分比比较,替格瑞洛组(8.0%、4.0%、4.0%)明显低于氯吡格雷组(75.0%、64.6%、60.4%),差异均有统计学意义(P均<0.001)。随访1个月内,替格瑞洛组与氯吡格雷组MACE发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(0 vs 8.3%,P=0.05);替格瑞洛组与氯吡格雷组出血事件比较,差异无统计学意义(14.0%vs 6.2%,P>0.05);替格瑞洛组次要出血事件高于氯吡格雷组,但差异无统计学意义(12.0%vs 4.2%,P=0.27)。结论 :对于接受PCI的ACS患者,替格瑞洛抗血小板聚集作用优于氯吡格雷,且出血事件无明显增加。
Objective: To explore the impact of ticagrelor on platelet aggregation in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) after percutaneous coronary intervention(PCI). Methods: A total of 98 ACS patients received PCI in our hospital from 2015-01 to 2015-12 were enrolled. The patients were randomly divided into 2 groups: Clopidogrel group, the patients received oral clopidogrel 300mg at first time and then maintained by 75mg/qd, n=48 and Ticagrelor group, the patients received oral ticagrelor 180rag at first time and then maintained by 90mg/bid, n=50. All patients were treated for 12 months.The level of vasodilator stimulated phosphoprotein (VASP) phosphorylation and platelet reactivity index (PRI) at pre-medication and 24h, 7 days and 1 month after PCI were detected; major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and bleeding events were recorded within 1 month after PCI, the incidence of platelet aggregation, MACE and bleeding events were compared between 2 groups. Results: The baseline information and PCI condition were similar between 2 groups, P〉0.05. The overall average PRI was different between 2 groups, P〈0.001 and PRI at each time point was different between 2 groups, P〈0.001, different group and time point had interactive effect on PRI, P〈0.001. Compared with Clopidogrel group, Tieagrelor group had the lower ratio of PRI〉50% at different time points after PCI, P〈0.001. The incidence of MACE and bleeding event were similar between 2 groups within 1 month after PCI, P〉0.05. Conclusion: Ticagrelor was superior toclopidogrel for anti-platelet aggregation in ACS patients after PCI, it didn't increase bleeding events.
出处
《中国循环杂志》
CSCD
北大核心
2017年第5期442-446,共5页
Chinese Circulation Journal
基金
河南省科技厅基础与前沿研究项目(142300410356)