股东协议效力的司法审查——股东间私人协议与公司治理协议二分化立场

Judicial Review of the Effectiveness of Shareholders' Agreements: Distinguishing the Shareholder 's Private Agreement and the Corporate Governance Agreement

在我国当前的司法裁判中,针对股东协议效力认定这一问题,存在着合同主义路径与公司本位路径两种相对立的裁判取向,二者各有不足之处。对于股东协议效力的司法认定,应区分股东间私人协议与公司治理协议而适用不同的效力认定规则,这样才能发挥保护股东权益和提升公司治理效能的司法裁判功能。

In our current judicial decision, there is a contradiction between the contractist path and the corporate standard path, which is different from each other in terms of the validity of the shareholder agreement. For the judicial determination of the effectiveness of the shareholders ＇agreement, it is necessary to distinguish between the private agreement between the shareholders and the corporate governance agreement and apply different rules of validity so as to play the judicial function to protect the shareholders＇ rights and enhance the efficiency of corporate governance.