C/E-NCAP侧碰试验方法对评价结果影响的对比

Comparison Analysis of New Car Assessment Results Between C-NCAP and E-NCAP Side Impact Testing Method

中国新车评价规程(C-NCAP)和欧洲新车评价规程(E-NCAP)的侧面碰撞试验方法存在差异,对评价结果会有不同影响。介绍了2种评价规程的侧面碰撞试验,分别设定EEVC和AE-MDB移动壁障、World SID型和Euro SID II型假人、不同碰撞位置等试验条件,通过实车侧面碰撞试验,对比假人受伤害程度和得分情况,得出不同试验条件对评价结果的影响。结果表明,使用AE-MDB壁障且碰撞点后移,后排假人腰部伤害值增加约24.8%。该分析为汽车企业面向欧洲和中国汽车市场而开发产品提供了参考。

The difference of side impact testing method between C-NCAP and E-NCAP has influence on the assessment. This paper introduces two side impact testing methods, describes the setting of the mobile deformable barriers of EEVC and AE- MDB, dummy of WorldSID, dummy of EuroSID II and collision position, the dummy injury and score between different side impact mobile deformable barrier testing method by the real vehicle collision test are compared, the different testing conditions affect the assessment. The results show that the use of AE-MDB barrier and moving the collision position increase the injury index 24.8% for the rear dummy, providing some reference in the development of vehicle in Chinese and foreign auto markets.