期刊文献+

医院介入诊疗设备辐射状况评价 被引量:1

Radiation evaluation of interventional diagnosis and treatment devices in hospital
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的 :探讨湖北某医院介入放射学设备运行对周围产生的辐射状况及工作人员的辐射水平。方法 :分析该医院辐射性工作场所辐射屏蔽状况,根据剂量当量控制水平,构建评价模型体系,估算数字化血管造影(digital subtraction angiography,DSA)机房屏蔽层厚及工作人员受照剂量。结果:DSA机房顶板的设计厚度小于理论估算厚度,其他机房屏蔽体的设计厚度均大于理论估算厚度,DSA机房东墙和顶板的理论估算厚度大于国家标准限值要求;工作人员不同部位受照剂量及年有效剂量均低于国家规定的限值要求。结论:DSA设备机房布局需进行优化,介入操作人员的辐射防护水平良好。 Objective To explore the radiation of the interventional diagnosis and treatment devices in some hospital of Hubei province to the circumstances and staffs.Methods The radiation shielding in the radiological workplace of the hospital was analyzed, and an evaluation model system was established based on dose equivalent level so as to estimate the shielding thickness of DSA machine room and the exposure dose to the staff. Results The designed shielding thickness of DSA machine room roof was tower than the theoretical one, while the designed thicknesses of other shields were higher than the theoretical ones, and the theoretical values of the east wall and roof in the DSA machine room were all higher than the limits of the national standards. The exposure doses to different parts and annual effective dose were all lower than the national limits. Conclusion The allocation of DSA machine room has to be optimized, and the staff gains satisfactory protection against radiation. [Chinese Medical Equipment Journal, 2017,38 (5) : 99-102]
作者 成浩 苏喆
出处 《医疗卫生装备》 CAS 2017年第5期99-102,共4页 Chinese Medical Equipment Journal
关键词 机房屏蔽 介入诊疗设备 辐射 屏蔽层厚 受照剂量 shielding of machine room interventional diagnosis and treatment room radiation shielding thickness expo- sure doses
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献18

  • 1Betsou S, Efstathopoulos EP, Katritsis D, Faulkner K, Panyiotakis G. Patient radiation doses during cardiac catheterization procedures. BJR, 1998, 71: 634-639
  • 2Cusma T, Bell MR, Wondrow MA, Taubel JP, Holmes DR. Real-time measurement of radiation exposure to patients during diagnostic coronary angiography and percutaneous interventional procedures. JACC, 1999, 33: 427-435
  • 3Fransson SG, Persliden J. Patient radiation exposure during coronary angiography and intervention. Acta Radiologica, 2000, 41: 142-144
  • 4Bakalya DM, Castellani MD, Safian RD. Radiation exposure to patients undergoing diagnostic and interventional cardiac catheterization procedures. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn, 1997, 42: 121-125, 126-129
  • 5Miller DL, BaLter S, Noonan PT, Georgia JD. Minimizing radiation-induced skin injury in interventional radiology procedures. Radiology, 2002, 225: 329-336
  • 6Putte S, Verhaegen F, Taeymans Y, Thierens H. Correlation of patient skin doses in cardiac interventional radiology with dose-area product. BJR, 2000, 73 (869): 504-513
  • 7Johnson DR, Kyriou J, MortonEJ, Clifton A, Fitzgerald M, Macsweeney E. Radiation protection in interventional radiology. Clin Radiol, 2001, 56: 99-106
  • 8Zorzetto M, Bernardi G, Morocutti G, Fontanelli A. Radiation exposure to patients and operators during diagnostic catheterization and coronary angioplasty. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn, 1997, 40 (4): 348-351
  • 9Vano E, Gonzalez L, Fernandez JM, Guibelalde E. Patient dose values in interventional radiology. BJR, 1995, 68 (815): 1 215-220
  • 10Padovani R, Bernardi G, Malisan MR, Vano E, Morocutti G, Fioretti PM. Patient dose related to the complexity of interventional cardiology procedures. Radiat Prot Dosimetry, 2001, 94 (1-2): 189-192

共引文献17

同被引文献4

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部