“天下兴亡,匹夫有责”的概念、逻辑与未来

Concept,logic and future of “every man alive has a duty to his country”

随着现代价值的传播,"天下兴亡,匹夫有责"规定的天下、政权、肉食者与匹夫之间的责任关系遭到了挑战,它如何回应现代价值需要学界分析。以形式逻辑角度分析,天下、国、肉食者、匹夫四者组合形成了"天下兴亡,匹夫有责"等十六种命题,这些命题在传统价值体系与现代价值体系中分别占有不同的位置。据此,现代社会中,"天下兴亡,匹夫有责"命题的影响力不可避免地减弱,"天下兴亡,匹夫有责"继续发挥作用,一方面须以"匹夫兴亡,天下有责"、"匹夫兴亡,国有责"等命题为理论前提,另一方面需要扩展传统匹夫之责的内涵,培育现代公民之责。

With the spread of modern values, the responsibility relationship of the country, the government, the man in power and the average person in the rise and fall of the world are challenged, which needs the academic analysis. In the form of logic analysis, the world, the government, the man in power and the average person formed 16 propositions which occupy different positions in the traditional value system and modern value system. The influence of ＂ every man has a duty to his country＂ has inevitably diminished. In the modern world, it is necessary to disseminate the propositions of ＂ the country has the responsibility for everyone＂, and to expand the connotation of the traditional responsibility of ev- ery man in order to cultivate the responsibility of modern citizens.