期刊文献+

组织危机沟通回应策略对员工情绪和行为的影响 被引量:2

The Effect of Crisis Situations and Organizational Response Strategies to Employees′Negative Emotion and Behavior Tendencies
下载PDF
导出
摘要 通过实验探究危机情境下组织回应策略对员工的负性情绪和行为倾向的影响。实验一采用被试间设计。探讨公众舆论危机情境下组织回应策略(机会解释,威胁解释)对员工情绪和行为倾向的影响。实验二采用2×2的被试间实验设计,探讨管理惩戒危机情境下利益相关性(主相关,他相关)和组织回应策略类型对员工情绪和行为倾向的影响。结果发现,威胁解释下被试的负性情绪更高;机会解释下的被试发生负性网络行为可能性高于威胁解释,但现实行为倾向水平均较低;员工利益主相关情境下,被试负性行为倾向更高,危机情境类型和组织回应策略类型交互作用显著。研究表明:机会解释对抑制员工的负性情绪更有效;威胁解释对抑制员工的负性网络行为倾向更有效;员工利益主相关的危机情境会使员工的负性情绪和负性行为水平更高。 The present study explored the effect of different crisis situations and organizational response strategies to employees' negative emotion and behavior tendencies. In experiment 1, 50 subjects were randomly selected from varies enterprises to test the effect of the two strategies (opportunity interpretation vs threat interpretation) to employees' emotion and behavior tendencies by a between subject design under a public crisis situation. In experiment 2, 50 subjects were randomly selected from varies enterprises under an inner managerial crises situation to explore the effect of relevant situation (self-related vs other-related) and organizational response strategies (opportunity interpretation vs threat interpretation) to employees' negative emotion and behavior tendencies. The study showed that the opportunity interpretation had more effect on inhibition on employees' negative emotion. Threat interpretation had more effect on inhibition on employees' negative internet behavior tendencies. Employees would have higher level of negative emotion and negative behavior under self-related situations.
出处 《心理与行为研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2017年第3期379-384,共6页 Studies of Psychology and Behavior
基金 天津市哲学社会科学研究规划项目(TJJX13-001)
关键词 危机沟通 回应策 威胁解 机会解释. crisis communication, response strategies, threat interpretation, opportunity interpretation.
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献31

  • 1Deci E L, Ryan R M. Intrinsic motivation and self-determ- ination in human behavior[M].New York: Plenum,1985:113- 147.
  • 2Amabile T M. A model of creativity and innovation in org- anizations[C] // Staw B M, Cummings L L. Research in org- anizational behavior. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press,1988:123-167.
  • 3Mumford G M, Scott B G, Jill M. Strange, leading creative people: Orchestrating expertise and relationships[J] . Leade- rship Quarterly, 2002, 13:705-750.
  • 4Liden R C, Wayne S J, Sparrowe R T. An examination of the mediating role of psychological empowerment on the rel- ations between the job, interpersonal relations, and work outcomes[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2000, 85:407- 416.
  • 5Onne Janssen. The joint impact of perceived influence and supervisor supportiveness on employee innovative behavior [J]. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 2005, 78:573-579.
  • 6Woodman R W, Sawyer J E, Griffin R W. Toward a theory of organizational creativity[J]. Academy of Management Re- view,1993,18:293-321.
  • 7Miller C C, Cardinal L B, Gliek W H. Retrospective rep- orts in organizational research: A reexamination of recent evi-dence[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 1997, 40:189- 204.
  • 8Hildebrandt L. Consumer retail satisfaction in rural areas: A reanalysis of survey data[J]. Journal of Economic Psyc- hology,1987,8:19- 42.
  • 9Podsakoff P, Organ D. Self-report in organizational resea- rch: Problems and prospects[J]. Journal of Management, 1986, 12:531-544.
  • 10Van Den Bosch J, Volberda D. Exploratory innovation, exp- loitative innovation, and performance: Effects of organizat- ional antecedents and environmental moderators[J]. Mana- gement Science, 2006, 52(11): 1661- 1674.

共引文献56

同被引文献18

引证文献2

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部