期刊文献+

经脐自制单孔腔镜与三孔腹镜阑尾切除手术的比较 被引量:13

Comparison of transumbilical self - made single - hole endoscope and three -hole laparoscopic appendectomy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨经脐自制单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术的有效性和安全性。方法采用随机数字表法,将我院就诊的60例急性阑尾炎患者随机分为对照组(给予三孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术治疗)与观察组(给予经脐自制单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术),比较2组手术效果。结果观察组患者在住院时间、住院费用、术后疼痛、肛门排气及术后美容满意度等方面显著优于对照组(P〈0.05);但观察组的手术时间明显较对照组延长(P〈0.05);2组患者在术中出血量及并发症的发生方面差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。结论阑尾炎切除术中选择经脐自制单孔腔镜手术方式安全可靠,有利于患者的快速康复,改善美容效果,值得在临床广泛开展。 Objective To explore the efficacy and safety of laparoscopic appendectomy using a transumbilical self - made single - hole endoscope. Methods A total of 90 patients with acute appendicitis who were admitted in our hospital from January 2016 to November 2016 were randomly divided into two groups : a control group ( who underwent three - hole laparoscopic appendectomy) and an observation group (who received transumbilical self- made single -hole laparoscopie appendectomy). Then, both groups were compared for surgical efficacy. Results Compared with the control group, improvements were found in the observation group as to hospitalization stay and cost, postoperative pain, anal ex- hausting and postoperative cosmetic satisfaction ( P 〈 0.05 ), with remarkable extended operation time ( P 〈 0.05 ). There was no significant difference in blood loss and complications between the two groups (P 〉 0.05 ). Conclusions Appendectomy can be carried out using a transmbilical self - made single - hole endoscope, which is safe and reliable, and beneficial for rapid rehabilitation and can improve cosmetic effects. It is worthy to be widely applied in clinical practice.
出处 《徐州医科大学学报》 CAS 2017年第5期319-321,共3页 Journal of Xuzhou Medical University
关键词 单孔腔镜 三孔腹腔镜 阑尾切除术 single - hole endoscopy three - hole laparoscopy appendectomy
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献88

  • 1Arun Prasad.Single incision laparoscopic surgery[J].World Journal of Gastroenterology,2010,16(21):2705-2706. 被引量:2
  • 2Masoomi H,Nguyen NT,Dolirh MO,et al. Comparison oflaparoscopic versus open appendectomy for acute nonperforated andperforated appendicitis in the obese population. Am J Surg,2011 ,202:733-738.
  • 3Yagnik VD,Halhod JB,Phalak AG. A retrospective study of two-port appendectomy and its comparison with open appendectomy and three-port appendecloiny. Saudi J Gaslroenterol,2010,16:268-271.
  • 4Suttie SA,Seth S,Driver CP,et al. Outcome after intra-and extra-coiporeal laparoscopic1 appendeclomv techniques. Surg Kndosc,2004,18:1123-1125.
  • 5Marescaux J,Dallemagne B,Perrelta S,et al. Surgery wilhoutscars:report of transluminal chiolecystectoniy in a human heing.Arch Surg,2007,142:823-826.
  • 6Saber AA,El-Ghazuly TH ,Dcwoolkar AV ,et al. Single-incisionlaparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy versus conventional multiportlaparoscopic sleeve gaslreclomy:technical considerations andstralegic modifications. Surg Ohes Relat Dis,2010,6:658-664.
  • 7Lee J,Baek J,Kim W. Laparoscopic transumbilical single-port appendectomy:initial experience and comparison with three-portappendeciomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech,2010,20 :100-J03.
  • 8Kim HO,Yoo CH,Lee SH,et al. Pain after laparoscopic appendectomy:a comparison of Iransumhilical siugle-port and conventional laparoscopic surgery. J Korean Surg Soc,2012,82 :172-178.
  • 9Golub R, Siddiqui F, Pohl D. Laparoscopic versus open ap- pendec-tomy : a metaanalysis [ J ]. J Am Coil Surg, 1998,186 (5) :545-553.
  • 10Esposito C, Borzi P, Valla JS, et al. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in ehildren:a retrospective comparative study of 2,332 eases[ J]. World J Surg ,2007,31 (4) :750-755.

共引文献92

同被引文献84

引证文献13

二级引证文献58

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部