摘要
作为资助企业博士后的国家政府基金,加拿大IRDF基金与我国CPSF基金体现了鲜明的差异。IRDF强调市场导向,贴近学科前沿,注重质量优势;CPSF体现国家意志,面向传统领域,注重规模优势。设立单独面向企业博士后的基金,完善过程中管理,调整考核导向,是我国企业博士后基金未来的发展趋势。
Both as national grants for postdoctoral in enterprises, Canada's IRDF is quite different from China^s CPSF. IRDF is more market-oriented, close to cutting edge of discipline, and focus on quality. CPSF is directed by the government, close to traditional fields, focuses on scale advantages more. lt^s a trend of development to set postdoctoral funds with setting up separate post-doctoral funds for enterprises, improve the process of management, adjust the orientation of assessment.
出处
《高等工程教育研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2017年第3期187-191,共5页
Research in Higher Education of Engineering
基金
教育部人文社会科学研究一般项目规划基金(15YJA880109)研究成果