期刊文献+

哲学领域女性偏少的现象、原因及其应对策略 被引量:2

Phenomena,Causes and Tackling Strategies of Professional Female Under-Representation:In the Case of the Philosophy Field
下载PDF
导出
摘要 与男性相比,在哲学领域女性偏少是一个普遍的事实。对于这种性别不平等现象,人们提出了众多的假设,其中主要的原因有:从哲学本身看是哲学无用谬误;从社会环境看是女性不宜偏见;从女性自身看是能力欠缺歧视。应对哲学领域女性偏少的策略有:(1)正本清源:宣扬哲学之用;(2)打破成见:凸显女性成就;(3)揭示真相:女性胜任哲学。借鉴对哲学专业女性偏少的分析模式,可以探讨任何专业中女性偏少或过多的现象、原因及其应对策略,从而推进专业领域的性别平等。 Compared with males, females in philosophy are widely under-represented. A large number of hypotheses have been put forward for gender inequality. The main reasons are : ( 1 ) the fallacy that philosophy is useless from the phil- osophical point; (2) bias against women perceived as unfit for philosophy from the point of the social environment; and (3) prejudice against women perceived as untalented from the point of women themselves. There are some strategies to ad- dress female under-representation in philosophy : ( 1 ) putting it right : to promote the usefulness of philosophy; (2) break- ing the prejudice: to highlight female achievements; and (3) revealing the truth: to affirm that women are perfectly fit phi- losophy. With the use of the analysis mode of female under-representation in philosophy, we will be able to explore any phenomena, causes and tackling strategies of female under-representation or over-representation in order to promote gender equality in all professions.
机构地区 厦门大学哲学系
出处 《厦门大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2017年第3期118-128,共11页 Journal of Xiamen University(A Bimonthly for Studies in Arts & Social Sciences)
基金 国家社科基金项目"实验知识论"(14BZX067) 国家社科基金重大项目"当代知识论的系列研究"(14ZDB012) 中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助项目"知识论与认知科学研究"(20720161047)
关键词 哲学领域 女性 性别不平等 philosophy, female under-representation, philosophical intuition, logical thinking, gender unbalance
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献15

  • 1Alan G. Sanfey, James K. Rilling, Jessica A. Aronson, Leigh E. Nystrom, and Jonathan D. Cohen," The Neural Basis of Economic Decision-Making in the Ultimatum Game", Science, : vol. 300 No. 5626 (2003), pp. 1755-1758.
  • 2Dominique J. F. de Quervain, Urs Fischbacher, Valerie Treyer, Melanie Schellhammer, Ulrich Schnyder, Alfred Buck and Ernst Fehr,"The Neural Basis of Altruistic Punishiment", Science,vol. 305(2004), pp. 1254-1258.
  • 3Daria Knoch, Alvaro Paseual-Leone, Kaspar Meyer, Valerie Treyer, Ernst Fehr," Diminishing Reciprocal Fairness by Disrupting the Right Prefrontal Cortex" ,Science Vol. 314(2006), pp. 829-832.
  • 4约翰·梅纳德·史密斯.《演化与博弈论》,潘春阳译,上海:复旦大学出版社,2008年,第10页.
  • 5阿克塞尔罗德.《合作的进化》,吴志坚译,上海:上海世纪出版集团,2007年,第22-36页.
  • 6阿克塞尔罗德.《合作的复杂性--基于参与者竞争与合作的模型》,梁捷,高笑梅等译,上海:上海世纪出版集团,2008年,第20-21、38页.
  • 7Katharina Hamann, Felix Warneken, Julia R. Greenberg & Michael Tomasello," Collaboration encourages equal sharing in children but not in chimpanzees" ,Nature,vol. 476(2011 ), pp. 328-331.
  • 8Richard D. Horan, Erwin Bulte, and Jason F. Shogren, "How Trade Saved Humanity from Biological Exclusion: An Economic Theory of Neanderthal Extinction", Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, vol. 58 ( 2005 ), pp. 1 - 29.
  • 9Ran Pinhasia, Thomas F. G. Highamb, Liubov V. Golovanovac, and Vladimir B. Doronichevc," Revised age of late Ne- anderthal occupation and the end of the Middle Paleolithic in the northern Caucasus", PNAS, vol. 108 (2011), pp. 8611-8616.
  • 10Deidre L. Reis, Marc A. Brackett, Noah A. Shamosh, Kent A. Kiehl, Peter Salovey, and Jeremy R. Gray," Emotional In- telligence predicts individual differences in social exchange reasoning", Neurolmage, 35 (2007), pp. 1385-1391.

共引文献2

同被引文献8

引证文献2

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部