上海中考数学测评和PISA数学测评成绩差异性研究——基于PISA2012年的测评结果

Research on the Differences Between the Unified Mathematics Academic Assessment for Junior High School (UMAAJHS) in Shanghai and PISA Mathematics Assessment-based on the Results of PISA 2012

中考数学测评作为大规模数学测评,具有学业水平评定功能,这就要求测评框架,如内容和过程领域上的维度构建,合理分布试题等都应关注。随着PISA数学测评的引进,两者的相似性和差异性,对中考数学测评上述问题解决所起的借鉴是非常值得分析的。本文通过细致梳理两个测评的试题分布,考查两者之间存在的相似和差异。进一步通过量化分析得到PISA数学成绩对上海初三15岁群体的中考数学成绩差异的解释率仅有51%左右,同时两个测评在过程领域上的差异对中考数学成绩差异解释率明显高于内容领域上的差异。这进一步启示我们在上海初中数学测评中,过程维度上构建及不同维度的试题分布需要进一步重视和完善,同时关注内容领域和过程领域之间内在的联系,重视以问题解决为重心的测评导向。

UMAAJHS has evaluation function with academic level, which requires the construction on dimension of assessment framework, such as content and process ,and reasonable distribution of test items. With the implementation of PISA mathematical assessment, similarities and differences of the two large- scale mathematical assessment（LSMA）, are very worth of analysis.In this paper, through careful combing two assessment distribution of test items, examines the similarities and differences between twoLSMA.Further, PISA mathematics result interprets only 51% or so of the diversity of students＇ UMAAJHS results who are 15 years old in ninth grade. At the same time,influence on diversity of assessment resultin two LSMA process domainis significantly higher than in content domain.Further inour Shanghai UMAAJHS, build process dimension and distribution of different dimensions of exams require further attention, and focus on internal relationship between the content and process, attach great importance to the center of gravity of assessment guide for problem solving.