期刊文献+

美国政治话语的隐喻架构模式建构研究——以布什和奥巴马的环保演讲为例 被引量:42

A Study of Constructing Metaphorical Framing Model of American Political Discourses:The Cases of Bush's and Obama's Speeches on Environmental Protection
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文以布什和奥巴马的四篇环保演讲为例,基于概念隐喻理论和架构理论,分析了其中的概念隐喻、表层和深层架构,研究发现:布什和奥巴马均使用了旅程、舞台等概念隐喻,但前者侧重单边外交、经济利益至上等架构;而后者侧重多边外交、经济和环保并重等架构,这与两党最根本的道德价值观吻合。文章还从建构的视角归纳出环保等重大议题的隐喻架构模式为:道德价值观→基本原则→议题蕴含的概念隐喻、深层架构→隐喻表达、表层架构→推论→叙事角色。 This paper analyzes the conceptual metaphor, surface and deep frames in Bush's and Obama's environmental protection speeches within the framework of Conceptual Metaphor Theory and Framing Theory. It is found that: Similar Metaphors such as JOURNEY, STAGE were both used in Bush's and Obama's speeches; The former focused more on frames of UNILATERAL DIPLOMACY and ECONOMIC INTERESTS FIRST, etc., while the latter focused more on MULTILATERAL DIPLOMACY, ECONOMY AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION BEING EQUALLY IMPROTANT, which was congruous with the fundamental morality of Republicans and Democrats. On the basis of the analysis this paper summarizes the Metaphorical Framing Model of major American issues like environmental protection as "morality→basic principles→conceptual metaphors and deep frames→metaphorical expressions and surface frames→inference→narrative role" from the perspective of construction.
作者 汪少华 张薇
出处 《中国外语》 CSSCI 北大核心 2017年第2期54-59,共6页 Foreign Languages in China
基金 2015年度江苏省社会科学重点项目"中国政治话语体系的认知构建研究"(项目编号:15YYA002) 2013年度江苏省高校哲学社会科学一般项目"亚青会和青奥会报道的隐喻架构分析"(项目编号:2013SJB740018)的部分研究成果
关键词 环保 概念隐喻 表层架构 深层架构 environmental protection surface frame deep frame conceptual metaphor
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献49

  • 1Slembrouck, S. Explanation, Interpretation and Critique in the Analysis of Discourse [ J ]. Critique of Anthropology, 2001 (21).
  • 2Slobin, D. Universal and Particular in the Acquisition of Language [ A ]. In E. Wanner and L. R. Gleitman (eds.). Language Acquisition: The State of the Art [C]. Cambridge: CUP, 1982.
  • 3Stubbs, M. W. Whorf' s Children: Critical Comments on Critical Discourse Analysis [ A ]. In A. Ryan & A. Wray ( eds. ). Evolving Models of Language: British Studies in Applied Linguistics 12[ C]. Clevedon: BAAL/ Muhilingual Matters, 1998.
  • 4Titscher, S. et al. Methods of Text and Discourse Analysis [ M ]. London: Sage, 2000.
  • 5van Dijk, T. Discourse, Power and Access [A]. In C. R. Caldas-Couhhard & R. Coulthard ( eds. ). Texts and Practices : Readings in Critical Discourse Analysis [ C ]. London: Routledge, 1996.
  • 6Verschueren, J. Predicaments of Criticism [J ]. Critique of Anthropology, 2001 (21).
  • 7Widdowson, H. G. Discourse Analysis: A Critical View [ J ]. Language and Literature, 1995 a (3).
  • 8Widdowson, H. G. Norman Fairclough: Discourse and Social Change [J]. Applied Linguistics, 1995b(4).
  • 9Widdowson, H. G. Reply to Fairclaugh: Discourse and Interpretation: Conjectures and Refutations [ J ]. Language and Literature, 1996( 1 ).
  • 10Widdowson, H. G. The Theory and Practice of Critical Discourse Analysis [ J]. Applied Linguistics, 1998 ( 1 ).

共引文献194

同被引文献327

引证文献42

二级引证文献123

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部