期刊文献+

剖宫产术后瘢痕子宫再次妊娠经阴道分娩的可行性及安全性研究 被引量:16

Feasibility and safety research on vaginal delivery in re-pregnancy by scarred uterus after cesarean section
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探究瘢痕子宫再次妊娠经阴道分娩的可行性及安全性。方法选取2016年10月~2017年2月我院收治的瘢痕子宫再次妊娠并自愿接受阴道试产产妇62例作为观察组,选择同期我院收治的符合阴道分娩条件的经产妇(第一胎自然分娩)60例作为对照组,比较两组的阴道分娩成功率、产程时间、产后出血量、住院时间以及新生儿Apgar评分、产妇产后并发症发生情况。结果观察组和对照组中均有49例产妇经阴道成功分娩,阴道分娩的成功率分别为79.03%和81.67%,两组比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);两组产妇产程时间、产后出血量、住院时间及新生儿Apgar评分比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);两组产妇产后并发症发生情况比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论只要在产前做好充分的评估及应急预案措施,并严格掌握阴道分娩的指征,瘢痕子宫产妇选择阴道分娩方式是可行的。 Objective To explore the feasibility and safety of vaginal delivery in re-pregnancy by scarred uterus.Methods Sixty-two puerperae in re-pregnancy by scarred uterus who were willing to accept vaginal delivery from October 2016 to February 2017 in our hospital were selected as observation group.Sixty pluriparae (natural labor in the first pregnan- cies) meeting the criteria of vaginal delivery admitted into our hospital during the same period were classified into con- trol group.The success rate of vaginal delivery,stage of labor,postpartum hemorrhage,hospital stay,score of neonatal Ap- gar,and incidence of postpartum complications in puerperae were compared in the two groups.Results There were 49 puerperae succeeding in vaginal delivery in both observation group and control group,the success rate of vaginal deliv- ery was 79.03% and 81.67% respectively,without statistically significant difference (P〉0.05).There was no significant difference in stage of labor,postpartum hemorrhage,hospital stay or score of neonatal Apgar (P〉0.05).There was no sta- tistically significant difference in postpartum complications detected in the two groups (P〉0.05).Conclusion As long as sufficient assessment and emergency plan and measures be prepared before delivery,together with strict control of vagi- nal delivery indications,vaginal delivery is still feasible in puerperae with scarred uterus.
作者 杨金娥
出处 《中国当代医药》 2017年第16期107-110,共4页 China Modern Medicine
关键词 瘢痕子宫 再次妊娠 阴道分娩 可行性 安全性 Scarred uterus Re-pregnancy Vaginal delivery Feasibility Safety
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

二级参考文献118

  • 1陈桂林.剖宫产后瘢痕子宫再次妊娠分娩方式的临床研究[J].河南外科学杂志,2010,16(3):5-7. 被引量:11
  • 2Giampiero Francica.可靠临床并且在剖腹产附近的腹的墙子宫内膜增生的诊断的 sonographic 调查结果结疤[J].World Journal of Radiology,2012,4(4):135-140. 被引量:7
  • 3林传喜,徐玲.剖宫产术后再次妊娠阴道试产的前瞻性研究[J].中华妇产科杂志,1995,30(12):721-723. 被引量:82
  • 4丰有吉,沈铿.妇产科学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2010,7(2):60.
  • 5Wang CB, Chiu WW, Lee CY, et al. Cesarean scar defect : correlation between Cesarean section number, defect size, clinical symptoms and uterine position[J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol,2009,34( 1 ):85-89.
  • 6Lumbiganon P, Laopaiboon M, Gtilmezoglu AM, et al. Method of deliv- ery and pregnancy outcomes in Asia: the WHO global survey on ma- ternal and perinatal health 2007-08 [ J ]. Lancet, 2010,375 (9713) : 4490 -4491.
  • 7Allomuvor GF, Xue M, Zhu X, et al. The definition, aetiology, presen- tation, diagnosis and management of previous caesarean scar defects [ J]. J Obstet Gynaecol,2013,33 (8) :759-763.
  • 8Beucher G, Dolley P, Levy-Thissier S, et al. Maternal benefits and risks of trial of labor versus elective repeat caesarean delivery in women with a previous caesarean delivery[ J]. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris) ,2012,41 ( 8 ) :708-726.
  • 9Galyean AM, Lagrew DC, Bush MC, et al. Previous cesarean section and the risk of postpartum maternal complications and adverse neo- natal outcomes in future pregnancies[J]. J Periuatol,2009,29( 11 ) : 726-730.
  • 10Olusanya BO, Solanke OA. Adverse neonatal outcomes associated with trial of labor after previous cesarean delivery in an inner-city hospital in Lagos, Nigeria [ J ]. Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 2009, 107 (2) :135-139.

共引文献695

同被引文献139

引证文献16

二级引证文献51

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部