期刊文献+

考虑换乘次数阈值的城轨乘客路径选择行为分析 被引量:2

Analysis of Route Choice Behavior of Urban Rail Passengers Considering Transfer Thresholds
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为分析通勤与非通勤乘客通常因不同的到达时间约束而表现出不同的路径选择行为差异,基于非集计理论构建了路径选择模型.该模型首先提出了换乘次数阈值概念,用以分析不同换乘次数条件下,换乘时间对乘客感知效用的影响;其次,在利用广州地铁实际路网数据生成有效路径集合的基础上,利用乘客实际路径选择数据确定乘客的换乘次数阈值;最后,基于改进PSL(path sized logit)模型的标定结果,对乘客路径选择行为进行对比分析.研究结果表明,通勤和非通勤乘客在高次数与低次数换乘条件下的换乘时间系数的比值分别为1.114 5、1.037 9,说明通勤者对高换乘次数的换乘时间更加敏感. In order to investigate the route choice behavior differences of commuters and non-commuters due to different time constraints, the disaggregate theory is employed to construct a route choice model. First, the concept of “transfer threshold” is proposed, which attempts to analyze the difference of penalty on perception utility of passengers under various conditions of transfers. Then, on the basis of the alternative route set generated from the transit network data of Guangzhou metro, the transfer thresholds are estimated using the revealed preference data of passengers. Finally, based on the estimation results from the proposed path-sized logit (PSL) model, passengers’ route choice preferences are analyzed. The results show that the parameter values of transfer time with a high number of transfers are 1. 114 5 and 1.037 9 times that with a low number of transfers for commuters and non-commuters, respectively, indicating that commuters are more sensitive to transfer time with a high number of transfers.
出处 《西南交通大学学报》 EI CSCD 北大核心 2017年第3期639-645,共7页 Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University
基金 国家"973"计划资助项目(2012CB725403-1) 北京市自然科学基金资助项目(8171003)
关键词 通勤与非通勤 路径选择 换乘次数阈值 PSL模型 commuters and non-commuters route choice transfer threshold PSL model
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献34

  • 1邵昀泓,王炜,程琳.出行方式决策的随机效用模型研究[J].公路交通科技,2006,23(8):110-115. 被引量:23
  • 2赵凛,张星臣.基于“前景理论”的路径选择行为建模及实例分析[J].土木工程学报,2007,40(7):82-86. 被引量:29
  • 3关宏志.非集计模型[M].北京:人民交通出版社,2004.
  • 4MICHAEL F,SANG N.A Combined Trip Distribution Modal and Trip Assignment Model[J].Transportation Research,1978,12(4):241-246.
  • 5WILSON P W.Scheduling Costs and the Value of Travel Time[J].Urban Studies,1989,26(3):356-366.
  • 6FORIANSH C V,KOPPELMAN F S.Application and In terpretation of Nested Logit Models of Intercity Mode Choice[J].Transportation Research Record,1993,1413:98-106.
  • 7CHANDRA R B.Work Travel Mode Choice and Number of Non-work Commute Stops[J].Transportation Research Part B:Methodological,1997,31(1):41-54.
  • 8YAO E J,MORIKAWA T.A Study on Integrated Intercity Travel Demand Model[J].Transportation Research Part A:Policy and Practice,2005,39(4):367-381.
  • 9DAAMEN W,BOVV P H L,HOOGENDOOM S P,et al.Passenger Route Choice Concerning Level Changes in Railway Stations[C]//Proceedings of Transportation Research Board-84th Annual Meeting.Washington DC:TRB Publisher,2005:1-18.
  • 10GORDILLO F.The Value of Automated Fare Collection Data for Transit Planning:An Example of Rail Transit OD Matrix Estimation[D].Massachusetts:Massachusetts Institute of Technology,2006:90-100.

共引文献61

同被引文献18

引证文献2

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部