期刊文献+

新闻聚合平台中深度链接行为的版权例外——以“搜狐诉今日头条”案为例

Copyright Exceptional Case of Deep Link Behavior on News Aggregation Platform:Taking the case of “Sohu Suing Today Headline” as an Example
下载PDF
导出
摘要 新闻聚合平台运用深度链接技术向用户输送作品满足了用户对新闻资讯及时、高效、便捷的要求,具有正外部性,但深度链接的侵权认定是版权法上不可跨越的鸿沟。新闻聚合平台推送的资讯分为时事新闻、时事性文章和新闻作品三类。时事新闻本身不属于作品,故其采用深度链接的推送行为不受版权法规制;若其推送的资讯为版权法22条第四项限定的时事性文章,则可援引合理使用制度;若其属于新闻作品,基于交易成本的考量,可适用法定许可制度平衡新旧媒体之间的利益冲突。 News aggregation platform transmits works to users through deep link technology, which meets the users' timeliness, effectiveness and convenience requirements on news, and has positive externality. But infringement cognizance of deep link behavior can not be ignored from copyright aspect. The information transmitted by the news aggregation platform can be divided into three kinds, which are topical news, topicality essays and news works. As the topical news do not belong to the work, its behavior of transmitting through deep link would not be restricted by the copyright law. If the information transmitted by the news aggregation platform meets the description of the topicality essays regulated in item 4 of article 22 of the copyright law, its transmission shall cite the fair use system. If the information transmitted by the news aggregation platform is news work, based on the consideration of the transaction cost, the statutory licensing system can be cited to balance the interests of old and new medias.
作者 王菲菲 WANG Feifei(College of Humanities and Law, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao , Shandong 266590, Chin)
出处 《宜宾学院学报》 2017年第5期59-64,共6页 Journal of Yibin University
关键词 深度链接 信息网络传播权 利益平衡 合理使用 法定许可制度 Deep link information network transmission right interest balance fair use statutory licensing system
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献27

  • 1郭禾.规避技术措施行为的法律属性辩析[J].电子知识产权,2004(10):11-17. 被引量:29
  • 2易晓阳.RSS:含义、本征与应用[J].图书馆学研究,2006(8):69-72. 被引量:23
  • 3北京市高级人民法院民事判决书(2007)高民初字第1201号.
  • 4《南方都市报》2014年06月06日的报导.《“今日头条”完成巨额融资掀侵权之争》http.//news.sina.com.cn/c/2014-06-06/055030303837.shtml,.
  • 5《专访张一鸣.告诉你今日头条到底在玩什么》,http.//blog.sina.com.cn/s/blog_4974cbcb0101inoa.html.
  • 6上海市卢湾区人民法院民事判决书(2010)卢民三(知)初字第61号.
  • 7INFOPAQ INTERSATIOSAL A/S v DASsKBDAGaLmuSFoRBSING, CASE C-5/08 (2009), PARA 64.
  • 8PUBLIC RELATIONS CONSULTANTS ASSOCIATION LTO V. NEWSPAPER LICENSING AGENCY LTD AND OTHERS, CASE C-360/13 (2014), PARA 43, 50.
  • 9PUBLIC RELATIONS CONSULTANTS ASSOCIATION LTH V. NEWSPAPER LICENSING AGENCY LTH AND OTHERS, CASE C-360/13 (2014), PARA 28.
  • 10PUBLIC RELATIONS CONSULTANTS ASSOCIATION LTO V. NEWSPAPER LIUENSINC AGENCY LTU AND OTHERS, CASE C-360/13(2014), PARA 57-60.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部