正当及其合理性阐释

On the Right and Its Rationality

正当一直是伦理学、政治学中的核心命题之一。在古希腊伦理学中,正当、善、美好生活三者内在统一,但是在康德之后日益分离。"正当"即指人们(包括个体和群体)在行动时所应该坚持和体现的合理性原则,同时也是人们评价其他人行为"对错"(真理意义)、"好坏"(法理意义)、或"高尚与低俗"(伦理意义)的价值标准。基于正当的三维解析,可以得出结论:正当即合理。合理性原则具体化为三种小写的"理":合真理——真理性正当;合伦理——伦理性正当;合法理——法理性正当。具体领域"理"(right)是大写"理"(RIGHT)之种,大写"理"是具体领域"理"之属。最完美的实践行为应该在三种意义上都具备正当性或者达到某种和谐,即"厚正当",只有"厚正当"才与最理想的"正当"完全对应。

The right has always been one of the core propositions in ethics and politics. In ancient Greek ethics, the right, the good and happy life shared inherent unity, but after Kant they were increasingly separa- ted. the right refers to not only reasonable principle that people （including individuals and groups） in action should insist on and embody, but also value standard that people evaluate other people＇s behavior on - right or wrong （truth meaning）, good or bad （legal meaning） , and noble and vulgar （ethical meaning）. Based on a three-dimensional analysis, it can be concluded that the RIGHT is rationality. The principle of rationality can be embodied in three kinds of rights by lower case： right truth （truth rationality）, right ethics （ethics rational- ity）, and right legitimacy （ legitimacy rationality）. The right in specific field is species of the capital RIGHT, and capital RIGHT is genera of the right in specific field. The most perfect practice should be justified in three senses or achieve some kind of harmony, that is Thick Right, only which can fully correspond to ideal right.