期刊文献+

动态抽象论辩系统基语义的单调性及其判定规则 被引量:1

The Monotony of Grounded Semantics of Abstract Argumentation and Its Determination Rules
下载PDF
导出
摘要 论辩系统是一种含层次结构的非单调形式体系。当底层的知识或信息发生变化时,上层的论辩框架及其语义也随之演化,这就是论辩系统的动态性。如何阐明及高效处理这种动态性是论辩理论研究领域的一个开放性问题。本文以一种简单的论辩语义(基语义)为起点,研究论辩系统动态性的一个重要方面:论辩语义的单调性问题。文章给出了基语义单调性的定义,实现基语义单调性的条件,以及判定基语义单调性的规则。 Argumentation system is a hierarchically structured non-monotonic formalism.When underlying knowledge or information changes,the corresponding argumentation framework and its semantics change accordingly.This process is called dynamics of argumentation systems.How to formulate and efficiently handle dynamics of argumentation is an open problem in the field of argumentation.Under a simple argumentation semantics(grounded semantics),this paper studies one important aspect of dynamics of argumentation:the monotony of argumentation semantics.After formally defining the monotony of grounded semantics,this paper first formulates conditions under which the property of monotony holds,and then present some rules that can be used to determine whether the property of monotony holds in different situations.
出处 《逻辑学研究》 CSSCI 2017年第2期22-44,共23页 Studies in Logic
基金 国家社会科学基金重大项目No.14ZDB014
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献39

  • 1Prakken H,Vreeswijk G. Logic systems for defeasible ar- gumentation[ C ]//Gabbay D. Handbook of Philosophical logic(2nd ed. ). IS. 1. ] :Kluwer Academic Pub,2000.
  • 2Vreeswijk G A W. Abstract argumentation systems [ J ]. Artificial Intelligence, 1997 (90) :225 - 279.
  • 3Nute D. I)efeasible reasoning and decision support sys- tems [ J ]. Decis. Support Syst., 1988 (4) :97 - 110.
  • 4Loui R. P. Defeat among arguments II, Report WUCS - 89 - 06, Department of Computer Science [ Z ]. [ S. 1. ] : Washington University, St. Louis, MO, 1989.
  • 5Dung P M. On the acceptability of arguments and its fun- damental role in non-monotonic reasoning,logic program- ming and n-person games [ J ]. Artificial Intelligence, 1995,77(2) :321 - 357.
  • 6Reiter R. A logic for default reasoning[ J]. Artificial In- telligence, 1980( 13 ) :81 - 132.
  • 7McCarthy J. Circumscription-a form of non-monotonic reasoning [ J ]. Artificial Intelligence, 1980 ( 13 ) : 81 - 132.
  • 8Liao B, Jin L, Robert C K. Dynamics of argumentation systems: A division-based method [ J ]. Artificial Intelli- gence,2011 ( 11 ) : 1790.
  • 9Bondareko A, Dung P M, Kowalski R A, et al. An ab- stract, argumentation-theoretic approach to default reason- ing[ J ]. Artificial Intelligence, 1997 (2) :63 - 101.
  • 10J. Pollock. Defeasible Reasoning [J]. Cognitive Science, 1987, 11(4): 481-518.

共引文献9

同被引文献3

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部