期刊文献+

农户视角下两种模式城乡建设用地增减挂钩效益对比分析 被引量:14

Compared Analysis of Comprehensive Benefit on Projects of “Linking the Increase in Land Used for Urban Construction with the Decrease in Land Used for Rural Construction”in Two Modes from the Perspective of the Peasant
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文以湖北省的五个增减挂钩项目作为研究对象,从经济、社会、生态三方面选取指标构建效益评价指标体系,利用农户数据,综合运用层次分析法和模糊综合评价法,测度政府主导模式和市场主导模式下各项目在挂钩实施前后效益的隶属度。结果显示,政府主导模式下,综合效益隶属度增长幅度一般,社会效益增长最大,生态效益有所下降;市场主导模式下,经济效益和生态效益隶属度增长幅度较大,但有较大波动和风险。为此,提出如下建议:市场主导模式下,要建立完善一套规范系统,加强政府在宏观上对项目的关键环节的监督、控制和约束;政府主导模式下,要引入市场机制,弥补政府主导模式中的资金缺乏问题,并通过市场的竞争机制提高效率;从项目区的视角,应使政府与市场结合,取长补短,平稳推进。 Based on the research data of 5 projects in Hubei province,this paper selects 15 indicators to build the evaluation index system,then uses Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation Model and Ordinal Logistic Regression Model to measure the comprehensive benefits of membership under two modes.The result shows that,under the government-led mode,the growth of the comprehensive benefit membership is relatively slow; under the market-led mode,the growth of economic benefit and ecological benefit's memberships are relatively large.Advice: Based on the perspective of market-led mode,we should perfect the market-led policy system,strengthen the government's management on the macroscopic supervision and control of the key links in project; Based on the perspective of government-led mode,we should introduce the market mechanism,to make up for the problem of lack of funds and resolve the inefficiency;Based on the perspective of the project area,we should combine the government and market.
出处 《农业经济问题》 CSSCI 北大核心 2017年第5期93-101,112,共9页 Issues in Agricultural Economy
基金 农业部软科学研究项目(编号:201521) 国家社会科学基金项目(编号:14BGL218)
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献113

共引文献169

同被引文献370

引证文献14

二级引证文献48

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部