欧盟“创业型教师”教育研究被引量：8

Study on Entrepreneurial Teacher Education of European Union

导出

摘要欧盟于20世纪90年代末开始重视创业教育,为了应对创业教育全面推行所产生的师资缺口,欧盟提出培养"创业型教师"的目标,并且从职前教师教育、教师持续专业发展、国家(地区)支持体系和地方学校支持等四个方面展开行动,不论在理论方面还是实践方面都有开拓意义。借鉴欧盟"创业型教师"教育的发展经验,我们应高度重视高师院校的创业教育,构建"创业型教师"教育"生态系统",鼓励和支持区域间建立伙伴合作,从而有效推动我国的创业教师教育。 European Union （EU） began to attach importance to entrepreneurship education since 1990s. In order to deal with the shortage of teachers caused by the full extension of entrepreneurship education, EU thereafter proposed the goal of training entrepreneurial teachers, and launched the actions on four dimensions, namely Initial Teacher Education, Continuing Professional Development, national （or regional） supports systems and school level support. Those actions are all of pioneering significance from both theoretical and practical perspectives. The systematic summarization of EU＇ s entrepreneurial teachers＇ education characters enlighten us to put a new premium on normal universities＇ entrepreneurship education, construct the eco-system of training entrepreneurship teachers, encourage and support partnership among various regions, and make a contribution to promoting entrepreneurial teacher education and enhancing the quality of innovative entrepreneurship education in China.

作者王占仁常飒飒 WANG Zhanren CHANG Sasa(Northeast Normal University, Changchun, Jilin, 130024)

机构地区东北师范大学思想政治教育研究中心

出处《比较教育研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2017年第6期20-27,共8页 International and Comparative Education

关键词欧盟创业型教师教师教育创业教育 European Union （EU） entrepreneurial teachers teacher education entrepreneurship education

分类号 G659.2 [文化科学—教育学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献1

1王占仁,常飒飒.美国高校创业教育“成熟性”、“合法性”及“发展趋势”的论争与启示[J].比较教育研究,2016,38(1):7-13. 被引量：7

二级参考文献11

1Brazeal,D.V. and Herbert,T.T. The Genesis of En- trepreneurship [J]. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 1999,23 ( 3 ) : 29-45.
2Low, M.B. The Adolescence of Entrepreneurship Research : Specification of Purpose [J]. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 2001,25 (4) : 17-26.
3Donald F. Kuratko. The Emergence of En- trepreneurship Education : Development, Trends, and Chal- lenges [J]. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 2005,29 ( 5 ) : 577-598.
4Jerome A. Katz. The Chronology and Intellectual Tra- jectory of American Entrepreneurship Education [J].Jour- nal of Business Venturing, 2003,18 ( 2 ) : 283-300.
5Jerome A. Katz. Fully Mature but Not Fully Legitimate:A Different Perspective on the State of En- trepreneurship Education [J]. Journal of Small Business Management, 2008,46( 4 ) : 550-566.
6Aldrich,H. E.,& M. C. Fiol. Fools Rush in The Institu-tional Context of Industry Creation [J]. Academy of Man- agement Review, 1994,19 (4) : 645-670.
7Kirk C. Heriot, Andres Jauregui, Tobias Huning, & Michael Harris.Evaluating the Legitimacy of Entrepreneurship and small Business as a Field of Study[J]. Journal of Enterpris- ing Communities:People and Places in the Global Econo- my,2014,1(8):4-19.
8Lumpkin GT. From Legitimacy to Impact: Moving the Field Forward by Asking How Entrepreneurship Informs Life[J]. Strategic Entreprenemhip Journal, 2011,5 : 3-9.
9Colin Jones , &Harry Matlay.Understanding the Betero- geneity of Entrepreneurship Education:Going beyond Gartner[J].Education+Training, 2011,8/9(53 ) : 692-703.
10Donald F. Kuratko.Entrepreneurship Theory, Process, and Practice in the 21 st Century [J]. Entrepreneurship and Small Business, 2011,1 ( 13 ) : 8-17.