二十世纪九十年代以来香港文学文化身份认同研究批判——以本土性与中国性的内在矛盾为核心

A Critique of Studies of the Cultural Identity of Hong Kong Literature since the 1990s: the Case of Inherent Contradiction between Nativeness and Chineseness

自二十世纪九十年代以来,香港及海外不少学者利用或借鉴"第三空间"理论来探究香港文学的文化身份认同问题,产生了均建立在以"本土性与中国性的内在矛盾"为根基进行论述的"边缘论""夹缝论"和"北进想像论"三种典型看法。为突破"本土/中国"讨论框架的局限,朱耀伟试图把视野转移到"东西方,本土和全球以至东方主义/后殖民性和全球资本主义之间"进行。以上的讨论实际显示出政治因素是长期制约香港文学和中国文学关系讨论的重要原因。他们在阐释理论的过程中均暴露了学术缺陷和意识形态立场,无论在学理还是现实上都无法让人信服。

Since the 1 990 s, Hong Kong and overseas scholars have borrowed the idea of the ＂third space＂ to investigate the issue of cultural identity in Hong Kong literature, which has brought about three typical views ： ＂the margin theory＂, ＂the crevice theory＂ and ＂the theory of imagining Hong Kong moving North＂, all based on the inherent contradiction between the I-Iong Kong nativeness and Chineseness. In order to transcend the framework of ＂Hong Kong and China＂, Zhu Yaowei shifts his vision to the framework of ＂East and West, local and global, orientalism/postcoloniality and global capitalism＂. The above discussion shows that political factors play a significant role in restraining the long-term discussion of the relationship between Hong Kong literature and Chinese literature. In the process of interpretation those discussions have displayed academic flaws and ideological biases, which, in theory and in reality, can hardly be convincing.