期刊文献+

论系统科学的一个统一理论范式——谈迪肯的涌现动力学理论对系统科学的意义 被引量:1

A Unified Theoretical Paradigm for System Science:A Philosophical Reflection on the Significance of Terrence Deacon's Theory of Emergent Dynamics for System Science
原文传递
导出
摘要 系统科学对传统科学的突破在于发现了层次涌现的规律,使传统科学的还原论幻想破灭;发现了共存于不同尺度的规律,打破了不同学科的藩篱。而这两点突破使系统科学作为统一的理论范式存在认识论和本体论上的困难。迪肯的否定性思考方式以及依此建构的涌现动力学理论则一方面解决了这些哲学上的困难,另一方面为系统科学提供了统一的解释,从而可以作为系统科学的一个统一理论范式。 The breakthroughs brought by system science to traditional sciences are that discovering regularities of emergence which broke down reductionist dream in traditional sciences, and finding that there are common regularities on different scales which pulled down party walls between different disciplines. However, the difficulty that system science being a unified theoretical paradigm originates from both breakthroughs that they bring epistemologieal and onto- logical confusions to system science. Deacon' s creatively negative thinking and the theory of emergent dynamics based on it articulate such confusions on the one hand, bring a unified explanation for system science on the other hand. Thus, the theory can be a unified theoretical paradigm for system science.
作者 周理乾
机构地区 南京大学哲学系
出处 《自然辩证法研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2017年第6期99-104,共6页 Studies in Dialectics of Nature
关键词 系统科学 涌现 分层 约束 涌现动力学 system science emergence hierarchy constraint emergent dynamics
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献11

  • 1卡特赖特 N.斑杂的世界:科学的边界研究[M].王巍,王娜,译,上海:上海科技教育出版社,2006;36.
  • 2Cartwright, N..The Dappled World, A Study of the Boundaries of Science, Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.1999.
  • 3Rouse, J. Knowledge and Power: Toward a Political Philosophy of Science, Ithaca: Cornell University Press. 1987.
  • 4Rouse, J.. Engaging Science: How to Understand Its Practices Philosophically, Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press. 1996.
  • 5Rouse, J. How Scientific Practices Matter: Reclaiming Philosophical Naturelism, Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press. 2002.
  • 6Peter Checkland. Soft Systems Methodology: A Thirty Year Retrospective[J] .Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 2000,17 : S11-S58.
  • 7Joseph Rouse. Knowledge and Power, toward a Political Philosophy of Science, Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press, 1987.
  • 8成思危.复杂性科学探索[M].北京:民主与建设出版社,1999.156-158.
  • 9乌杰.关于差异的哲学概念[J].系统科学学报,2008,16(2):1-3. 被引量:30
  • 10严火其,李琦.自然主义的哈尼稻作及其可持续发展[J].中国农史,2008,27(3):33-44. 被引量:18

共引文献19

同被引文献6

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部