期刊文献+

不同超声检查对直肠乙状结肠深部浸润型子宫内膜异位症诊断价值的Meta分析 被引量:15

Ultrasound value in diagnosis of deep infiltrating endometriosis in rectosigmoid:Meta-analysis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的采用Meta分析评价经阴道增强超声(E-TVS)、经阴道超声(TVS)、经直肠超声(TRS)对直肠乙状结肠深部浸润型子宫内膜异位症的诊断价值。方法检索1990年1月—2016年6月关于E-TVS、TVS、TRS诊断直肠乙状结肠深部浸润型子宫内膜异位症(DIE)的中英文文献,提取纳入研究的信息,采用Meta-disc 1.4软件对研究数据进行统计学分析。结果共纳入25篇英文文献。E-TVS的敏感度、特异度、阳性似然比、阴性似然比、诊断性比值比分别为0.92、0.96、16.64、0.09、227.95;TVS为0.83、0.97、16.95、0.17、112.97;TRS为0.94、0.96、14.43、0.08、208.72。3组SROC曲线下面积分别为0.980 4、0.966 3、0.979 0。结论 3种超声检查方法对直肠乙状结肠DIE的诊断价值由高至低依次为E-TVS、TRS、TVS。E-TVS可作为超声诊断直肠乙状结肠DIE的首选方法。 Objective To explore the diagnostic value of comparing enhanced transvaginal ultrasound (E-TVS), none enhanced transvaginal ultrasound (TVS), and transrectal ultrasound (TRS) in preoperative detection of deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE) in the rectosigmoid by Meta-analysis. Methods The literatures published from January 1990 to June 2016 were searched. The information of literatures were sdected and evaluated. The included data was statistically analyzed by Meta-disc 1.4 software. Results Totally 25 literatures were enrolled. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, diagnostic odds ratio were 0.92, 0. 96, 16.64, 0.09, 227.95 for ETVS, 0.83, 0. 97, 16.95, 0.17, 112.97 for TVS, 0.94, 0. 96, 14.43, 0.08, 208.72 for TRS, respectively. Area under the curve were 0. 980 4, 0. 966 3, 0. 979 0, respectively. Conclu- sion Diagnostic value of the three ultrasonography in preoperative detection of DIE in the rectosigmoid are E-TVS, TRS, TVS. E-TVS can be used as the preferred method of ultrasonic diagnosis of DIE in the rectosigmoid.
出处 《中国医学影像技术》 CSCD 北大核心 2017年第6期912-916,共5页 Chinese Journal of Medical Imaging Technology
关键词 子宫内膜异位症 直肠 结肠 乙状 超声检查 经阴道 超声检查 经直肠 META分析 Endometriosis Rectum Colon, sigmoid Ultrasonography, transvaginal Ultrasonography, transrectaI Meta-analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献14

  • 1胡蓉,向红.异位妊娠的超声诊断及鉴别诊断[J].中国医学影像技术,2007,23(2):314-317. 被引量:17
  • 2Hoover KW, Tao G, Kent CK. Trends in the diagnosis and treatment of ectopic pregnancy in the United States. Obstet Gy- necol, 2010,115(3) :495-502.
  • 3Chung K, Chandavarkar U, Opper N, et al. Reevaluating the role of dilation and curettage in the diagnosis of pregnancy of un- known location. Fertil Steril, 2011,96(3):659-662.
  • 4Kirk E, Daemen A, Papageorghiou AT, et al. Why are some ee- topic pregnancies characterized as pregnancies of unknown loca- tion at the initial transvaginal ultrasound examination? Acta Ob- stet Gynecol Stand, 2008,87(11) :1150-1154.
  • 5CasikarI, Reid S, Condous G. Ectopic pregnancy: Ultrasound di- agnosis in modern management. Clin Obstet Gynecol, 2012, 55 (2) :402-409.
  • 6Murray H, Baakdah H, Bardell T, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of ectopic pregnancy. CMAJ, 2005,173(8) :905-912.
  • 7Kirk E. Ultrasound in the diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy. Clin Obstet Gynecol, 2012,55 (2) : 395-401.
  • 8Alkatout I, Honemeyer U, Strauss A, et al. Clinical diagnosis and treatment of ectopic pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol Surv, 2013, 68(8) : 571-581.
  • 9Cordina M, Schramm-Gajraj K, Ross JA, et al. Introduction of a single visit protocol in the management of selected patients with pregnancy of unknown location: A prospective study. BJOG, 2011,118(6) : 693-697.
  • 10Barnhart K, van Mello NM, Bourne T, et al. Pregnancy of un- known location: A consensus statement of nomenclature, defini- tions, and outcome. Fertil Steril, 2011,95(3):857-866.

共引文献20

同被引文献66

引证文献15

二级引证文献52

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部