期刊文献+

自体造血干细胞移植治疗多发性骨髓瘤预处理方案的研究进展 被引量:2

Progress in preconditioning regimen of autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for treatment of multiple myeloma
原文传递
导出
摘要 大剂量美法仑(Mel)是多发性骨髓瘤(MM)疗效最肯定的预处理方案.全身放疗(TBI)联合Mel的疗效不优于单用Mel,但不良反应增加.在年轻患者中Mel 200 mg/m^2疗效优于Mel 100~140 mg/m^2.MelBU、TBC、BCV、MET、MTC、MelBCNU、VMel、MTC以及含有苯达莫司汀的预处理方案可获得同大剂量Mel类似的治疗效果.新预处理方案的效果需要更多临床试验证实. High-dose melphalan (Mel) is considered as a current standard preparative regimen in autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) for multiple myeloma (MM). Irradiation in total body (TBI) combined with Mel is not superior to Mel alone, and the adverse reactions are increased at the same time. The efficacy of 200 mg/m^2 Mel is much better than that of 100-140 mg/m^2 Mel in young patients. Several regimens including MelBU, TBC, BCV, MET, MTC, MelBCNU, VMel, MTC as well as bendamustine have similar treatment outcomes compared with 200 mg/m2 Mel. Other strategies need to be evaluated in different trials.
出处 《白血病.淋巴瘤》 CAS 2017年第5期313-317,共5页 Journal of Leukemia & Lymphoma
基金 南京市医学科技发展项目(YKK14056、YKK14069)
关键词 多发性骨髓瘤 造血干细胞移植 移植预处理 Multiple myeloma Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation Transplantation conditioning
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献9

  • 1Palmnbo A, Anderson K. Multiple myeloma. N Eng J Med, 2011, 364 : 1046-1060.
  • 2Attal M, Harousseau JL, Stoppa AM, et al. A prospective, ran- domized trial of autologous bone marrow transplantation and chemo- therapy in multiple myeloma. Intergroupe Francais du Mylome. N Engl J Med, 1996, 335:91-97.
  • 3Benson DM, Elder PJ, Lin TS, et al. High-dose melphalan versus busulfan, cyclophospha- mide, and etoposide as preparative regi- mens for autologous stem cell transplantation in patients with multi- ple myeloma. Leukemia Res, 2007, 51:1069-1075.
  • 4Lahuerta JJ, Mateos MV, Martinez-L6pez J, et al. Busulfan 12 mg/kg plus melphalan 140 mg/m2 versus melphalan 200 mg/m2 as conditioning regimens for autologous transplantation in newly diag- nosed multiple myeloma patients included in the PETHEMA/ GEM2000 study. Haematologica, 2010, 95:1913-1920.
  • 5Durie BGM, Harousseau JL, Miguel .IS, et al. International uni- form response criteria for multiple myeloma. Leukemia, 2006, 20 : 1467-1473.
  • 6Kroger N, Hoffknecht M, I-Ianel M, et al. Busulfan, cyclophos- phamide and etoposide as high-dose conditioning therapy in pa- tients with malignant lymphoma and prior dose-limiting radiation therapy. Bone Marrow Transplant, 1998, 21: 1171-1175.
  • 7Cogle CR, Moreb JS, Leather HL, et al. Busulfan, cyclophospha- mide, and etoposide as conditioning for autologous stem cell trans- plantation in multiple myeloma. Am J Hematol, 2003, 73:169- 175.
  • 8Krivoy N, Hoffer E, Lurie Y, et al. Busulfan use in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: pharmacology, dose adjustment, safety and efficacy in adults and children. Curt" Drug Saf, 2008, 3:60- 66.
  • 9Blanes M, de la Rubia J, Lahuerta J J, et al. Single daily dose of intravenous busulfan and melphalan as a conditioning regimen for patients with muhiple myeloma undergoing autologous stem cell transplantation: a phase ]I trial. Leuk Lymphoma, 2009, 50: 216-222.

共引文献7

同被引文献7

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部