摘要
P2P网贷平台不断推陈出新的业务模式与运作方式频频遭遇刑法评价上罪与非罪的拷问。刑民分界问题成为处理该领域案件难以回避的争议焦点,主要包括拆标行为、担保行为中的刑民分界问题。处理刑民争议案件应坚持一定的理念与原则,实体法上应贯彻刑事优先理念,"刑法是最后一道屏障"的观念不适用于刑事司法层面;程序法上应根据涉案标的是否具有同一性,妥善处理民事诉讼程序与刑事诉讼程序之间的关系。
Peer- to -peer lending internet platforms continue to introduce and apply new business models and operating patterns which gives rise to a number of problems in conviction of crimes. It becomes an unavoidable issue when it comes to application between civil and criminal law in dealing with such cases like tender - splitting or guarantee - offering p2p model. There are several principles shall be adhered to when facing such problems : firstly, the doctrine of criminal law prevails over civil law should be implemented which means the saying of criminal law is the last barrier doesn't apply in criminal adjudication, and secondly, the relationship between civil and criminal procedure law needs to be properly handled by the homoousia of the involved subject.
出处
《法学杂志》
CSSCI
北大核心
2017年第6期25-32,共8页
Law Science Magazine
基金
国家社科基金重大项目"涉信息网络违法犯罪行为法律规制研究"(项目批准号:14DB147)
2016年度中国法学会重点课题"互联网金融犯罪的法律规制"(项目编号:CLS2016ZDWT48)的阶段性成果
关键词
P2P网络借贷
刑民分界
借贷拆标
融资担保
peep- to- peer lending
differentiation between criminal and civil law
tender- splitting lending
financing guarantee