期刊文献+

WTO争端解决机制中“法庭之友”的应用探讨

The Necessity of Amicus Curiae's Participation in WTO Dispute Settlement System
下载PDF
导出
摘要 非政府组织作为"法庭之友"是目前最主要也是最重要的形式之一。本文从国际贸易、国际投资及国际政治角度,对WTO争端解决机制引入"法庭之友"的必要性及重要性进行了论证,并采取实证研究的方法,对非政府组织作为"法庭之友"的案例及现状进行分析,进而对WTO争端解决机制中的"法庭之友"制度构建提出了相关建议,以期其能为国际贸易、国际投资等作出更大的贡献。 With the larger scope of cases accepted by the WTO Dispute Settlement, more and more NGOs try to participate in the WTO dispute settlement with the intention of guarding public interests. However, the rationality and validity of amicus submission is controversial. Therefore, the issue of NGO participating in the WTO dispute settlement as amicus curiae is worth studying. On the basis of the brief introduction of the NGO, this paper demonstrates the necessity and importance of introducing the NGO to the WTO Dispute Settlement from the perspective of international trade, international investment and international politics. This paper explores the historical practice and current situation of non- governmental organizations as the NGO in the WTO Dispute Settlement, and finally puts forward some suggestions on the construction of the NGO in the WTO dispute settlement to help it make a greater contribution to international trade, international investment and others.
作者 刘文君 张阳 LIU Wenjun ZHANG Yang(East China University of Political Science and Law, 201620 Shanghai China)
机构地区 华东政法大学
出处 《上海商学院学报》 2017年第2期33-37,共5页 Business Economic Review
关键词 法庭之友 非政府组织 WTO争端解决机制 amicus curiae, NGO, WTO Dispute Settlement
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献18

  • 1赵海峰,高立忠.论国际司法程序中的法庭之友制度[J].比较法研究,2007,21(3):68-79. 被引量:17
  • 2Lance Bartholomeusz. The amicus curise before international courts and tribunals. Netherlands:Non- State Actors and International Law ,2005 :p.219.
  • 3Philippe Sands, Ruth Mackenzie and Yuval Shany. Manual of International Courts and Tribunals, Butterworths. London, Edinburgh, Dublin Butter- worths, 1999 : p. 57.
  • 4Dinah Shehon, The Participation of Nongovernmental Organizations in International Proceedings,88 American Journal of International Law 611 -619(1994).
  • 5《国际法院规约》第66条第2款规定.
  • 6《国际海洋法法庭规则》第84条和第133条.
  • 7WTO Appellate Body Report. United States - Import Prohibition of Certain Shrimp and Shrimp Products. World Trade Organization, 2001 (4) :109.
  • 8Susan L. Thomas,C. J.S. Amicus Curiae § 8 (June 2008).
  • 9Panel Report , United States Import Prohibition on Certain Shrimp and Shrimp Products, WT/DS58/AB/R,2Oetober 1998,para 5.57.
  • 10刘京莲.法庭之友参与国际投资仲裁体制研究[J].太平洋学报,2008,16(5):6-17. 被引量:6

共引文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部