期刊文献+

足先进体位左桡动脉途径在外周血管内介入诊疗中的临床价值 被引量:1

Clinical analysis of advanced food position left radial artery pathway applied in the peripheral blood tube interventional diagnosis and treatment
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:比较足先进体位左桡动脉途径与右桡动脉途径行外周血管内介入诊疗的安全性与可行性。方法:203例行外周血管内介入诊疗的患者随机分为足先进体位左桡动脉组和右侧桡动脉组,比较两组桡动脉穿刺时间、目标靶血管到位时间及到位率、手术时间、X线曝光时间、血管痉挛发生率、穿刺插管并发症发生率。结果:左桡动脉组患者的靶血管到位时间明显短于右桡动脉组(t=6.710,P<0.05),靶血管到位率明显高于右桡动脉组(χ~2=4.916,P<0.05)。两组穿刺时间、X线曝光时间、手术时间、血管痉挛发生率以及穿刺插管并发症发生率比较,差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。结论:足先进体位左桡动脉途径与右桡动脉途径在外周血管内介入诊疗中同样安全、可行,但在靶血管到位时间、目标靶血管到位率上较右桡动脉有优势。 Ob je c t iv e: T h e safe ty and fe as ibili ty of advanced food p os ition le f t radial a r te ry p a thw ay and th e right radial artery pathway were compared. Methods:203 patients were randomly divided into left radial artery path-way group and right radial artery pathway group. The radial artery puncture time, time and rate of reach the target blood vessel,X-ray ex p osure t ime,th e incidence of v a so sp a sm, p u n c tu re in tu b a t io n complicat ions. Resul t s: T h e time of reach the target blood vessel in left radial artery pathway was shorter than right radial artery pathway (r=6. 710,P 〈0. 05) . The rate of reach the target blood vessel in lef t radial ar tery pa thway was highe r than r ight radial artery pathway (x 2 =4. 9 1 6, P〈0. 0 5 ) . T h e radial a r te ry p u n c tu re time,X-ray ex p osure time, th e incidence of v a s -ospasm ,puncture intubation complications were no significant difference in the two group (P〉0. 05). Conclusion: Advanced food position left radial artery pathway and the right radial artery pathway in interventional diagnosis and treatment of peripheral blood tube is safe, feasible. Left radial artery pathway take the advantage of time and rate of reach the target blood vessel.
出处 《陕西医学杂志》 CAS 2017年第6期741-743,共3页 Shaanxi Medical Journal
关键词 放射学 介入性 穿刺术 桡动脉 @左桡动脉途径 Radiology,interventional Punctures Radial artery @Left radial artery pathway
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献66

  • 1刘新林,刘军翔,梁国庆,李玉明.经桡动脉与经股动脉途径冠状动脉旋磨治疗不稳定型心绞痛的疗效对比研究[J].中国全科医学,2013,16(8):873-875. 被引量:4
  • 2Mulukutla SR,Cohen HA.Feasibility and efficacy of transradial access for coronary interventions in patients with acute myocardial infarction[J].Cathet Cardiovasc Intervent,2002,57 (2):167-171.
  • 3Iwasaki S,Yokoyama K,Takayama K,et al.The transradial approach for selective carotid and vertebral angiography[J].Acta Radiol,2002,43(6):549-555.
  • 4Kessel DO,Robertson I,Taylor EJ,et al.Renal stenting from the radial artery:a novel approach[J].Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol,2003,26(2):146-149.
  • 5Kiemeneij F,Vajifdar BU,Eccleshall SC,et al.Evaluation of a spasmolytic cocktail to prevent radial artery spasm during coronary procedures[J].Cathet Cardiovasc Intervent,2003,58 (3):281-284.
  • 6Abu-Ful A,Benharroch D,Henkin Y.Extraction of the radial artery during transradial coronary angiography:an unusual complication[J].J Invasive Cardiol,2003,15(6):351-352.
  • 7Hildick-Smith DJ,WalshJT,LoweMD,et al.Coronary angiography in the fully anticoagulated patient:the transradial route is successful and safe[J].Cathet Cardiovasc Intervent,2003,58(1):8-10.
  • 8Campeau L.Percutaneous radial artery approach for coronary angioplasty[J].Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn, 1989,16(1):3-7.
  • 9Kiemenei J F, Laarman G H, Odekerken D, et al. A randomized comparison of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty by the radial, brachial and femoral approach-es: the access study[J]. J Am Coll cardiol, 1997, 29(3): 1269- 1275.
  • 10Pristipino C, Pelliccia F, Granatelli A, et al. Comparison of access related bleeding complications in women versus men undergoing percutaneous coronary catheterization using the radial versus femoral atery[J]. Am J Cardiol, 2007, 99 (4): 1216-1221.

共引文献37

同被引文献13

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部