期刊文献+

七组抗菌药物治疗支气管扩张合并感染的对比研究 被引量:5

Comparative Study on Seven Groups of Antibiotics in Treatment of Bronchiectasis Complicated with Infections
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨七组抗菌药物治疗支气管扩张合并感染的疗效,以筛选出疗效好、花费少的治疗方案。方法:选取2014年7月—2015年12月宣城市人民医院收治的支气管扩张合并感染患者111例作为研究对象,以随机数字表法分为A组(阿莫西林克拉维酸钾+左氧氟沙星)15例、B组(阿莫西林克拉维酸钾+阿奇霉素)15例、C组(头孢米诺+阿米卡星)15例、D组(头孢哌酮舒巴坦+阿米卡星)17例、E组(头孢哌酮舒巴坦+左氧氟沙星)19例、F组(头孢他啶+阿米卡星)15例、G组(头孢他啶+左氧氟沙星)15例,共七组。观察七组患者的临床疗效、住院时间、抗菌药物费用及不良反应发生情况。结果:D、E、F、G组患者的总有效率均>90%,且该四组患者总有效率的差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。排除无效病例后,组间比较,七组患者住院时间的差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。D组患者抗菌药物费用最低,其次为F组,D、F组患者抗菌药物费用的差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。C、D、F组患者不良反应发生率最低,与其他各组比较,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:头孢他啶联合阿米卡星治疗支气管扩张合并感染的疗效最好、住院时间最短、抗菌药物费用较低、住院总费用最低、不良反应最少。 OBJECTIVE:To probe into the efficacy of seven groups of antibiotics in treatment of bronchiectasis complicated with infections, so as to screen out the therapeutic regimen with significant efficacy and low costs. METHODS : 111 patients with bronchiectasis complicated with infections admitted into People' s Hospital of Xuancheng from Jul. 2014 to Dec. 2015 were selected to be divided into group A (amoxicillin potassium clavulanate + levofloxacin) with 15 cases, group B (amoxicillin potassium clavulanate + azithromycin) with 15 cases, group C (cefminox + amikacin) with 15 cases, group D (cefoperazone sulbactam + amikacin) with 17 cases, group E (cefoperazone sulbactam + levofloxacin) with 19 cases, group F (ceftazidime + amikacin) with 15 cases and group G (ceftazidime + levofloxacin) with 15 cases via the random number table. The clinical efficacy, length of hospital, antibiotics costs and incidence of adverse drug reactions of seven groups were observed. RESULTS: The total effective rates of group D, E, F, G were all 〉90%, and there was no statistical significance among four groups(P 〉0. 05). Except for invalid cases, there was no statistical significance among seven groups(P 〉0.05 ). The antibiotics costs of group D were the lowest, followed by group F, there was no statistical significance between group D and F ( P 〉 0. 05 ). The incidences of adverse drug reactions in group C, D and F were the lowest, compared with other groups, the difference was statistically significant (P 〈 0. 05 ). CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy of ceftazidime + amikacin in treatment of bronchiectasis complicated with infections is significant, with shortest length of hospital, lowest antibiotics costs, lowest total hospital costs and fewer adverse drug reactions.
出处 《中国医院用药评价与分析》 2017年第5期623-625,共3页 Evaluation and Analysis of Drug-use in Hospitals of China
关键词 支气管扩张 抗菌药物 对比研究 Bronchiectasis Antibiotics Comparative study
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献79

  • 1胡必杰,魏丽,张秀珍,唐英春,倪语星,黎毅敏,郭纪全,胡云建,张扣兴,杨莉.医院获得性肺炎发病时间对病原构成影响的回顾性队列研究[J].中华结核和呼吸杂志,2005,28(2):112-116. 被引量:48
  • 2刘又宁,陈民钧,赵铁梅,王辉,王睿,刘庆锋,蔡柏蔷,曹彬,孙铁英,胡云建,修清玉,周新,丁星,杨岚,卓建生,唐英春,张扣兴,梁德荣,吕晓菊,李胜歧,刘勇,俞云松,魏泽庆,应可净,赵峰,陈萍,侯晓娜.中国城市成人社区获得性肺炎665例病原学多中心调查[J].中华结核和呼吸杂志,2006,29(1):3-8. 被引量:787
  • 3申小青.支气管扩张症患者感染加重期的病原菌分布及其药敏情况[J].临床肺科杂志,2007,12(4):370-371. 被引量:10
  • 4叶任高,陆再英.内科学[M].第7版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2008.778-779,284-297.
  • 5Pasteur MC, Bilton D, Hill AT. British Thoracic Society Bronchiectasis non-CF Guideline Group. British Thoracic Society guideline for non-CF bronchiectasis. Thorax, 2010, 65 Suppl 1: i1 -i58.
  • 6Twiss J, Metcalfe R, Edwards E, et al. New Zealand national incidence of bronchiectasis " too high" for a developed country. Arch Dis Child, 2005, 90:737e40.
  • 7Weycker D, Edelsberg J, Oster G, et al. Prevalence and economic burden of bronchiectasis. Clin Puhn Med, 2005, 12: 205 -209.
  • 8Woodhead M, Blasi F, Ewig S, et al. European Respiratory Society; European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. Guidelines for the management of adult lower respiratory tract infections. Eur Respir J,2005,26 : 1138-1180.
  • 9Woodhead M, Blasi F, Ewig S, et al. Guidelines for the management of adult lower respiratory tract infections - - full version. Clin Microbiol Infect, 2011, 17 Suppl 6: El-E59.
  • 10Pasteur MC, Bilton D, Hill AT, et al. British Thoracic Society guideline for non-CF bronchiectasis. Thorax,2010,65 Suppl 1 :i1- 58.

共引文献851

同被引文献32

二级引证文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部