期刊文献+

二线方案治疗98例复发难治弥漫大B细胞淋巴瘤的疗效及预后分析 被引量:14

Efficacy and prognostic analysis of 98 cases of relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma treated with second-line regimens
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的研究二线方案治疗复发或难治性弥漫大B细胞淋巴瘤(DLBCL)的有效性及相关预后因素。方法回顾性2004年7月至2016年6月收治的98例复发难治性DLBCL患者的临床资料,评估化疗结束后缓解率,采用Kaplan-Meier方法计算总生存期(OS),并采用Cox回归法进行多因素分析,寻找影响患者OS的独立预后因素。结果98例患者中男60例,女38例,中位年龄55.5(15~77)岁。48例(49.0%)获得缓解,其中完全缓解32例(32.7%),部分缓解16例。难治DLBCL(早期进展或复发〈12个月)(χ2=5.878,P=0.015)、IPI中高危/高危(χ2=5.930,P=0.015)和NCCN-IPI中高危/高危(χ2=4.961,P=0.026)是影响化疗缓解率的不良因素,生发中心来源型(GCB)与非生发中心来源型(non-GCB)患者的化疗缓解率差异无统计学意义[χ2=0.660,P=0.417]。1年OS率为51.0%,2年OS率为31.5%,中位OS时间为13.17个月。多因素分析显示,NCCN-IPI中高危/高危[HR=2.176(95%CI 1.338~3.538),P=0.002]是影响患者生存的独立危险因素,化疗后缓解是提高患者OS率的独立预后因素[HR=0.273(95%CI 0.165~0.452),P〈0.001]。结论NCCN-IPI可作为复发难治性DLBCL患者的一个强有力的预后评价手段,化疗后缓解是患者获得较长OS的独立预后因素。 ObjectiveTo evaluate the efficacy and prognostic factors of second-line regimens for patients with relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL).MethodsA retrospective analysis was performed in 98 patients with relapsed/refractory DLBCL who were treated with salvage regimens in Rui Jin Hospital from July 2004 to June 2016. Overall response rate (ORR) was evaluated after all treatment finished. Overall survival (OS) was analyzed by Kaplan-Meier method and multivariate by Cox proportional hazards models.ResultsThere were 60 males and 38 females with a median age of 55.5 (15-77) years. 48 (49.0%) patients responded to chemotherapy, and 32 (32.7%) patients achieved complete remission (CR). Factors affecting ORR were progression disease or refractory/relapse status less than 12 months after diagnosis (χ2=5.878, P=0.015) , IPI intermediate-high/high risk (χ2=5.930, P=0.015) and NCCN-IPI intermediate-high/high risk (χ2=4.961, P=0.026). No significance difference was observed in ORR between germinal-center B-cell type (GCB) and non-GCB (χ2=0.660, P=0.417). One-year and 2-year OS rates were 51.0% and 31.5%, with median OS at 13.17 months, respectively. Multivariate analysis indicated NCCN-IPI intermediate-high/high risk[HR=2.176 (95%CI 1.338-3.538) , P=0.002] and response to chemotherapy [HR=0.273 (95%CI 0.165-0.452) , P〈0.001] were independent prognostic factors for survival.ConclusionNCCN-IPI is a valid predictor of outcome for patients with relapse/refractory DLBCL. Response to chemotherapy is an independent prognostic factor for better survival.
出处 《中华血液学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2017年第6期511-516,共6页 Chinese Journal of Hematology
基金 国家自然科学基金(81325003、81520108003、81670716) 上海市科委课题(14430723400、14140903100、16JC1405800) 上海市杰出青年医学人才培养计划 上海市教委高原高峰计划(20152206、20152208) 上海市静安区卫生科研课题(2016MS11)
关键词 淋巴瘤 大B细胞 弥漫性 抗肿瘤联合化疗方案 预后 Lymphoma, large B-Cell, diffuse Antineoplastic combined chemotherapy protocols Prognosis
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献53

  • 1陈愉,杜洪,胡维维,韩西群,贺莉,宋兰英,朱梅刚,赵彤.非霍奇金淋巴瘤365例WHO新分类的临床病理分析[J].诊断病理学杂志,2004,11(5):304-307. 被引量:32
  • 2张彦宁,周小鸽,张淑红,王鹏,张长淮,黄受方.非霍奇金B细胞淋巴瘤369例病理形态观察 2001年世界卫生组织淋巴组织肿瘤新分类应用体会[J].中华病理学杂志,2005,34(4):193-197. 被引量:36
  • 3程月新,徐卫,李建勇,钱思轩,陆化,吴汉新,陈丽娟.非霍奇金淋巴瘤641例临床分析[J].南京医科大学学报(自然科学版),2006,26(9):837-840. 被引量:15
  • 4Chuang SS, Lin CN, Li CY. Malignant lymphoma in southern Taiwan according to the revised European-American classification of lymphoid neoplasms. Cancer, 2000,89 : 1586-1592.
  • 5Coiffier B, Lepage E, Briere J, et al. CHOP chemotherapy plus rituximab compared with CHOP alone in elderly patients with diffuse large-B-cell lymphoma. N Engl J Med, 2002,346:235-242.
  • 6Rossini F, Terruzzi E, Perego D, et al. Long-term follow-up of patients with intermediate or high-grade non-Hodgkin lymphoma treated with a combination of cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, vincristine, and prednisone. Cancer, 2004,100:350-355.
  • 7Dixon DO, Neilan B, Jones SE, et al. Effect of age on therapeutic outcome in advanced diffuse histiocytic lymphoma: the Southwest Oncology Group experience. J Clin Oncol, 1986,4:295-305.
  • 8Pfreundschuh M, Trumper L, Osterborg A, et al. CHOP-like chemotherapy plus rituximab versus CHOP-like chemotherapy alone in young patients with good-prognosis diffuse large-B-cell lymphoma: a randomised controlled trial by the MabThera International Trial (MINT) Group. Lancet Oncol, 2006, 7:379-391.
  • 9Pfreundschuh M, Kloess M, Zeynalova S, et al. Six vs. Eight cycles of bi-weekly CHOP-14 with or without rituximab for elderly patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) : resuhs of the completed RICOVER-60 trial of the German High-Grade NonHodgkin's Lymphoma Study Group (DSHNHL). Blood, 2006, 108 : 64a.
  • 10Coiffier B. What treatment for elderly patients with aggressive lymphoma? Ann Oncol, 1994,5:873-875.

共引文献32

同被引文献102

引证文献14

二级引证文献39

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部