论马克思政治哲学研究的两种方法——从段忠桥教授与李佃来教授的争论说起

On Two Different Approaches in the Study of Marx's Political Philosophy——From the Debate between Prof. DUAN Zhongqiao and Prof. LI Dianlai

段忠桥教授与李佃来教授围绕马克思政治哲学与历史唯物主义关系问题而展开的争论,反映了国内马克思政治哲学研究中的两种颇具代表性的方法,即分析哲学的方法与思想史的方法。这两种方法之间的差异还表现为它们被用于解读马克思文本尤其是马克思的市民社会概念时所得出的不同结论。从文本解读的角度来看,在辨析概念的语义时,扩展概念所处语境的范围,承认概念自身的前史和多重面相,能够实现两种方法的相容。

The debate about the issue of the relationship between Marx＇ s political philosophy and historical materialism, initiated by Prof. DUAN Zhongqiao and Prof. L1 Dianlai, reflected two different representative approaches - - - analytic philosophy approach and intellectual history approach - - - in the study of Marx＇ s political philosophy in China. The difference between these two approaches also lay in the different conclusions when they were employed to interpret Marx＇ s text, especially Marx＇ s concept of civil society. From the perspective of text interpretation, in the case that we expanded the range of the context where the concept appeared and acknowledged the early history and multiple dimensions of the con- cept when analyzing its semantics, these two approaches could be compatible.