期刊文献+

奥布卡因表面麻醉和利多卡因局部阻滞麻醉对经直肠前列腺穿刺术疼痛控制的比较 被引量:1

Comparison of Pain Control During Transrectal Puncture Between Benoxinate Surface Anesthesia and Local Anesthesia of Lidocaine
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨经直肠前列腺穿刺术采用奥布卡因表面麻醉和利多卡因局部阻滞麻醉对疼痛控制的影响。方法按照就诊先后顺序,将80例择期行经直肠前列腺穿刺术患者随机分为研究组(奥布卡因表面麻醉)与对照组(利多卡因局部阻滞麻醉)。对比两组麻醉效果。结果两组疼痛程度、并发症发生率差异不显著(P>0.05);研究组手术时间少于对照组(P<0.05)。结论利多卡因与奥布卡因疼痛控制效果相当,但表面麻醉操作简单,能缩短手术时间。 Objective To investigate the effect of transrectal prostatic biopsy with benoxinate surface anesthesia and local anesthesia of lidocaine on pain control. Methods According to the sequence of treatment, 80 cases of patients undergoing transrectal prostate biopsy were randomly divided into study group (oxybuproeaine surface anesthesia) and control group (local anesthesia block liddle kain). The effect of anesthesia between the two groups was compared. Results The difference of pain degree and complication rate between the two groups was not significant (P 〉 0.05); The operation time of the study group was less than that of the control group (P 〈 0.05). Conclusion Lidocaine and benoxinate can achieve even pain control effect, but the surface anesthesia has the advantages of simple operation, can shorten the operation time.
作者 李东勋
出处 《中国卫生标准管理》 2017年第12期121-122,共2页 China Health Standard Management
关键词 经直肠前列腺穿刺术 奥布卡因 布比卡因 transrectal puncture benoxinate bupivacaine
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献84

  • 1孟小鑫,华立新,吴宏飞.经直肠前列腺穿刺活检并发症分析[J].中华男科学杂志,2002,8(3):210-211. 被引量:14
  • 2王文营,邵强,杜林栋.超声引导前列腺12针系统穿刺活检术[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,2005,26(4):270-273. 被引量:23
  • 3李贵忠,刘流,黄广林,陈涛,闫冰,高岩,罗飞,刘宁,王建伟,满立波,何峰,王海.经会阴B型超声引导下前列腺穿刺活检的临床价值研究[J].中华男科学杂志,2005,11(11):828-831. 被引量:8
  • 4山刚志,金杰,郭应禄.不同前列腺穿刺活检方案检出前列腺癌的比较[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,2006,27(1):40-42. 被引量:24
  • 5Wagenlehner F M, Pilatz A, Naber K G, et al. Therapeutic challenges of urosepsis[J]. Eur J Clin Invest, 2008,38 Suppl 2,45-49 .
  • 6Hugosson J, Carlsson S, Aus G, et al. Mortality results from the Goteborg randomised population-based prostate-cancer screening trial [J]' Lancet On col , 2010, 11(8), 725-732.
  • 7Loeb S, Vellekoop A, Ahmed H U, et al. Systematic review of complications of prostate biopsy [J]. Eur Urol, 2013, 64(6), 876-892.
  • 8Raaijmakers R, Kirkels W J, Roobol M J, et al. Complication rates and risk factors of 5802 transrectal ultrasound-guided sextant biopsies of the prostate within a population-based screening program [J]' Urology, 2002,60(5),826-830.
  • 9Manoharan M, Ayyathurai R, Nieder A M, et al. Hemospermia following trans rectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy, a prospective study [J]. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis, 2007, 10(3), 283-287.
  • 10Loeb S, van den Heuvel S, Zhu X, et al. Infectious complications and hospital admissions after prostate biopsy in a European randomized trial[J]. Eur Urol , 2012,61(6),1110-1114.

共引文献49

同被引文献13

引证文献1

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部