期刊文献+

超声和磁共振成像在胎儿蛛网膜囊肿中的对比分析 被引量:2

Comparative study of ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging in fetal intracranial arachnoid
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的前瞻性地探讨和比较超声(US)和磁共振成像(MRI)在胎儿蛛网膜囊肿产前诊断中的应用价值。方法对17例产前超声检查怀疑单纯性蛛网膜囊肿的胎儿中枢神经系统(CNS)进行US和MRI检查,16例胎儿随访至生后1年或引产病检证实,失访1例;将16例胎儿两种检查的结果与随访结果进行对比分析。结果在产前CNS超声检查怀疑蛛网膜囊肿的16例胎儿中,MRI诊断胎儿正常5例,胎儿均足月生产无特殊;MRI明确诊断胎儿蛛网膜囊肿10例,修正诊断1例,均行引产且胎儿尸检结果均证实异常。在胎儿蛛网膜囊肿检查中:超声诊断正确率62.5%,错误率37.5%;磁共振成像检查与最终结果均符合,诊断正确率100%。结论超声是产前胎儿中枢神经系统检查的首选,但诊断效力有限,MRI是重要的补充;当超声检查怀疑胎儿蛛网膜囊肿时,需进行MRI检查进一步确诊或修正诊断。 Objective To evaluate the accuracy of Ultrasonography (US) and Magnetic Resonance Imaging(MRI) in fetal intracranial arachnoid cyst. Method Seventeen fetuses suspected suffering from intracranial araehnoid cyst underwent US and MRI. Sixteen cases were followed up until birth or confirmed by pathology after induction of labor. The results of US and MRI were compared with the final outcomes. Results In sixteen cases suspected suffering from intracranial arachnoid cyst, five cases were comfirmed normal in MRI and these fetuses were born in full-term without anything abnormal ; ten cases were cornfirmed by MRI and one cases had corrected diagnosis. Fetal autopsy confirmed their abnormals. Diagnostic accuracy rate of US was 62.5%, error rate was 37.5% ; Diagnostic accuracy rate of MRI was 100%. Conclusions US is the first choice in examination of fetal CNS,but its diagnostic efficacy was limited. MRI which with high diagnostic accuracy is an important supplement. When prenatal US examination suspected IAC,fetus should be conformed by MRI.
出处 《中国产前诊断杂志(电子版)》 2017年第1期37-41,共5页 Chinese Journal of Prenatal Diagnosis(Electronic Version)
关键词 超声 磁共振成像 蛛网膜囊肿 产前诊断 ultrasonography MRI arachnoid cyst prenatal diagnosis
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献31

  • 1周丛乐.早产儿脑室周围白质软化的发生与预后[J].小儿急救医学,2004,11(4):207-209. 被引量:13
  • 2Baker PN, Johnson IR, Harvey PR, et al. A three-year follow-up children imaged in utero with echo-planar magnetic resonance. AmJ Obstet Gynecol,1994:170(1 Pt 1):32-33.
  • 3De Wilde JP, Rivers AW, Price DL, et al. A review of the current use of magnetic resonance imaging in pregnancy andsafety implications for the fetus. Prog Biophys Mol Biol,2005; 87(2-3) :335-353.
  • 4Magin RL, Lee JK, Klintsova A, et al. Biological effect of long-duration high-field (4T) MRI on growth and development in the mouse. J Magn Reson Imaging, 2000 : 12 ( 1 ) : 140-149.
  • 5Vadeyar SH, Moore RJ, Strachan BK, et al. Effect of fetal magnetic resonance imaging on fetal heart rate patterns. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2000 ; 182 (3) : 666-669.
  • 6Mevissen M, Buntenkotter S, Loscher W. Effect of static and time varying magnetic field on reproduction and fetal development in rats. Teratology,1994:50(3):229-237.
  • 7Tamara TC, Jodi SD, Richard CA, et al. Central nervous system findings on fetal magnetic resonance imaging and outcomes in children with spina bifida. Obstet Gynecol, 2010; 116(2 Pt 1) :323-329.
  • 8Gupta P, Sharma R, Kumar S, et al. Role of MRI in fetal abdominal cystic masses detected on prenatal sonography. Arch Gynecol Obstet, 2010 : 281 (3) : 519-526.
  • 9Hosny IA, Elghawabi HS. Ultrafast MRI of the fetus: an increasingly important tool in prenatal diagnosis of congenital anomalies. Magn Reso Imaging,2010:28(10):1431-1439.
  • 10Huisman TA, Martin E, Kubik-Huch R, etal. Fetal magnetic resonance imaging of the brain: technical considerations and normal brain development. Eur Radiol, 2002: 12 (8): 1941- 1951.

共引文献17

同被引文献13

引证文献2

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部