摘要
目的评估在尿液检验中尿常规和尿沉渣的相关性。方法抽选2016年1—4月本院接收的尿液检测患者50例,以不同检验方法为分组依据:观察组(25例,以尿沉渣法检验),对照组(25例,以尿常规法检验),对2组检验结果、相关性进行比对。结果两组各项符合率对比,差异不具有统计学意义,P>0.05;比对2组红细胞、白细胞、尿蛋白等检测符合率,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论临床以尿常规和尿沉渣方法检验尿液的效果显著,建议联合2种检验方法,可在保证尿液检验准确率得以提升的基础上,还能使假阴/假阳性率得到降低。
Objective To assess the correlation between urinalysis and urinary sediment in urine tests. Methods From January to April 2016, 50 selected urine samples of patients in our hospital were divided, with different test methods into the observation group (25 cases with urinary sediment test), control group (25 cases in the routine urine test), test results were compared. Results There was no significant difference between the two groups in the coincidence rate, P〉0.05; comparison test of 2 groups of red blood cells, white blood cells, urine protein coincidence rate, the difference was not statistically significant (P〉0.05). Conclusion Routine urine and urine urine test method are effective and the combinstion of two test methods, in which urine test can improve the accuracy rate, but also make the false positive rate of false negative / reduced.
出处
《中国继续医学教育》
2017年第12期63-64,共2页
China Continuing Medical Education
关键词
尿液检验
尿常规
尿沉渣
相关性
urine test
urinalysis
urinary sediment
correlation