试论曹丕“文本同而末异”之“本同”

Discussion on Cao Pi′s in ‘Same Origin,but Different Expression Forms in Articles’

"文本同而末异"说、"文以气为主"说以及"经国之大业"说是曹丕《典论·论文》中的重要理论观点。学界的研究重点大都围绕着"文以气为主"说和"经国之大业"说,而对"文本同而末异"说关注不够。而且,在这三个主要理论中,"文本同而末异"这一命题又是在学界里颇具争议,尤其是对何为"本同"的理解,可谓是仁者见仁,智者见智。笔者认为"文本同而末异"之"本同"应该从文体学的角度来理解,"本同"指的是产生所有文体的本源相同。下面从何为"本同"、"本同"之因两个方面分析论证了"本同"应从文体学的角度理解为产生所有文体的本源相同。

The view of ＇same origin, but different expression forms in articles＇ ,＇ Articlesshow the authors＇ personalities and talents＇ and ＂Great undertaking of Managing a country＇＂ are the important perspectives in Cao Pi＇s Talking About Classic and TalkingAbout Literature. Academic researchesmostly focus on the latter two, but insufficient attention to the first one. However, in the three major theories, the view of ＇same origin, but different expression forms in articles＇ is controversial in academic circles ,especially in the understanding of what is ＂same origin＂. From the perspective of the stylistics, the author thinksthat ＇same origin＇ refers to that the origin that produces all the literary typesare the same. From the aspects of what is ＇same origin＇ and why is＇same origin＇, this paper analyzes and demonstrates that the ＇same origin＇ should be interpreted as the same origin which produce all the literary types from the perspective of the stylistics.