摘要
目的比较MIPPO双钢板固定与单钢板加空心螺钉固定技术治疗SchatzkerⅤ、Ⅵ型胫骨平台骨折的临床疗效。方法将42例SchatzkerⅤ、Ⅵ型胫骨平台骨折患者按治疗方法分为两组,分别采用切开复位单侧锁定钢板加空心拉力螺钉内固定(单钢板加空心螺钉组,20例)和MIPPO双钢板内固定(MIPPO双钢板组,22例)。比较两组的手术时间、术中出血量、骨折愈合时间、膝关节功能HSS评分以及胫骨平台内翻角(TPA)和胫骨平台内侧后倾角(PSA)的变化。结果患者均获得随访,时间12~18(15±2.8)个月。两组手术时间、术中出血量、术后3 d及术后6个月时TPA、PSA比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);骨折愈合时间MIPPO双钢板组少于单钢板加空心螺钉组(P<0.05);术后12个月单钢板加空心螺钉组塌陷较MIPPO双钢板组严重(P<0.05);术后12个月膝关节HSS功能评分MIPPO双钢板组优于单钢板加空心螺钉组(P<0.05)。结论采用MIPPO双钢板内固定技术治疗SchatzkerⅤ、Ⅵ型胫骨平台骨折疗效理想,具有创伤小、固定牢靠、可早期功能锻炼、并发症少等优点。
Objective To compare the clinical effects of type Ⅴ,Ⅵ tibial plateau fractures treated with MIPPO combined with double-plates and single-plate combined with compressive hollow screws.Methods The 42 patients with the tibial plateau Schatzker type Ⅴ,Ⅵ fractures were divided into two groups.Twenty patients were treated with single-plate combined with compressive hollow screws internal fixation,and 22 patients were treated with MIPPO combined with double-plates internal fixation.The operative time,intra-operative bleeding,healing time of fracture,HSS scores of the knee joint function,tibial plateau-tibial shaft angle(TPA) and posterior slope angle(PSA) were compared.Results All the patients were followed up for 12~18(15±2.8) months.There were no statistical significance between two groups&#39; mean operation time,blood loss volume,TPA and PSA at 3 d and 6 months (P〉0.05).The fracture healing time of the group of MIPPO combined with double-plates was less than the group of single-plate combined with compressive hollow screws(P〈0.05).At 12 months postoperation,the collapse degree of tibial plateau collapse in the group of single-plate combined with compressive hollow screws was more serious than that in the group of MIPPO combined with double-plates(P〈0.05),and the HSS score of the group of MIPPO combined with double-plates was better than that of the group of single-plate combined with compressive hollow screws (P〈0.05).Conclusions The method of MIPPO combined with double-plates internal fixation has good satisfactory therapeutic effects on treating tibial plateau Schatzker type Ⅴ,Ⅵ fractures,and has advantages of minimal invasive aspect,strong fixation,early functional training of postoperation and less complication.
出处
《临床骨科杂志》
2017年第3期344-347,共4页
Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics
关键词
胫骨平台骨折
骨折固定术
内
MIPPO
MIPPO
tibial plateau fractures
fracture fixation
internal